From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [90.155.50.34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E8912D94A1; Mon, 24 Nov 2025 19:20:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=90.155.50.34 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1764012021; cv=none; b=Iy4rL3AU2KG0OkJhAzjqPfqNqr10kDGrUHQTgv8m5b20zyLh/kW0svwM/tFiMKJQhuQDmKJvD6qFtLWJfz97VC+aJ2e2+9NuzAWfl3zFpSGh6+8T0uyX5vZuuHXz29ev9kpVVtcI6qlo10d8r+v6C6kYWpyz7QTvKow9PH1DFY8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1764012021; c=relaxed/simple; bh=f/4aZMWxPlAyIiHj6MThjV7JghxDz7OC0FQ3b1flVJY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=dcVesBffiFQlWxsN/uwKo/6JDxsnpLnh9+eRHfa36sg9e7Z68NkodBYRmYX5dy9c0+VoGFLSDUKdQzHaVoiVCYPP66JnM6ZkySjR32hJwXzy42J2Es63+qb6NWeX5Idv70gGRK3GItJyGpasesY++uS7cKHNb45SYFwmkjXDfU4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b=a8a9BFrp; arc=none smtp.client-ip=90.155.50.34 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="a8a9BFrp" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=fwyBdQ8S3hBpJzyG7dUQUraaJtfMXjgG926lfpSXbdg=; b=a8a9BFrpFPXFUM2WUbySkshtR1 aecylyHZS2IK1wa9T4dHbVkA8NNbZkwFKYTJCUJO0CIpKECnlzxB/nhFwpp8dSf6Hw/UY7z3CRAtG LETfvdIda5jF90hgYRRXWT+6nmJDIarY5NGNt1jJtg+0cQPuPPhaFufgbeIDqQPvTdy6ocdkbwy9y RV+bFZNtSwCZ5mXNjAVppf9PPRcAv5+4JKKMkT/avvGRFgj2OnB1yNjw2dxSbzZmtAwwnfKjhdzKi 1rJoUy/d6lqxiKhEyAZpzeGngd8Mw6bmNFL1QCdjnZXrguevBiW1D19SK0zx/NOmOF5yjtvZCUR6x G6Dpar7A==; Received: from willy by casper.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vNc6j-00000007PuN-07JX; Mon, 24 Nov 2025 19:20:17 +0000 Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2025 19:20:16 +0000 From: Matthew Wilcox To: Theodore Tso Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Ext4 Developers List , linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] generic/127 failure caused by "mm: Use folio_next_pos()" Message-ID: References: <20251124191811.GA26781@mac.lan> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20251124191811.GA26781@mac.lan> On Mon, Nov 24, 2025 at 01:18:11PM -0600, Theodore Tso wrote: > And then when I reverted commit 60a70e61430b, the test passed. I also > checked and found that this commit was also causing generic/127 to > fail for xfs: > > kvm-xfstests -c xfs/4k generic/127 --fail-loop-count 0 --kernel-build > > And, with the commit reverted the problem went away. > > The test logs for ext4 and xfs are attached. Willy, could you take a > look? Many thanks!! https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20251123220518.1447261-1-willy@infradead.org/