public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	aalbersh@kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mkfs: enable new features by default
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2025 22:31:22 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aS_ZOpzcp04ovBwk@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251203005345.GD89492@frogsfrogsfrogs>

On Tue, Dec 02, 2025 at 04:53:45PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 01, 2025 at 11:38:46PM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 01, 2025 at 05:28:16PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > > From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
> > > 
> > > Since the LTS is coming up, enable parent pointers and exchange-range by
> > > default for all users.  Also fix up an out of date comment.
> > 
> > Do you have any numbers that show the overhead or non-overhead of
> > enabling rmap?  It will increase the amount of metadata written quite
> > a bit.
> 
> I'm assuming you're interested in the overhead of *parent pointers* and
> not rmap since we turned on rmap by default back in 2023?

Yes, sorry.

> I see more or less the same timings for the nine subsequent runs for
> each parent= setting.  I think it's safe to say the overhead ranges
> between negligible and 10% on a cold new filesystem.

Should we document this cleary?  Because this means at least some
workloads are going to see a performance decrease.


  reply	other threads:[~2025-12-03  6:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-02  1:27 [PATCHSET 2/2] xfsprogs: enable new stable features for 6.18 Darrick J. Wong
2025-12-02  1:28 ` [PATCH 1/2] mkfs: enable new features by default Darrick J. Wong
2025-12-02  7:38   ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-12-03  0:53     ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-12-03  6:31       ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2025-12-04 18:48         ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-12-02  1:28 ` [PATCH 2/2] mkfs: add 2025 LTS config file Darrick J. Wong
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-12-09 16:16 [PATCHSET V2] xfsprogs: enable new stable features for 6.18 Darrick J. Wong
2025-12-09 16:16 ` [PATCH 1/2] mkfs: enable new features by default Darrick J. Wong
2025-12-09 16:22   ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-12-09 22:25   ` Dave Chinner
2025-12-10 23:49     ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-12-15 23:59       ` Dave Chinner
2025-12-16 23:07         ` Darrick J. Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aS_ZOpzcp04ovBwk@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=aalbersh@kernel.org \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox