public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
	Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] rename xfs.h
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2025 15:30:13 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aTZUVTH4pMITncqc@dread.disaster.area> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251205081224.GA21377@lst.de>

On Fri, Dec 05, 2025 at 09:12:24AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 04, 2025 at 09:21:58AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > > Fine with me if that name is ok for shared code.
> > 
> > Why not merge the xfs_linux.h stuff into xfs_priv.h?  It's not like xfs
> > supports any other operating systems now.
> 
> We should merge them anyway, but I understood Dave in that he preferred
> the xfs_linux.h name over xfs_priv.h one.

Yeah, that. It's really the include file for the platform specific
definitions, not anything "private" to XFS. If we want the same name
for userspace and kernel, then maybe xfs_platform.h is best, and
userspace can then include whatever OS/library specific platform
headers it needs from that.

> I don't really care either
> way, I just don't want to redo the patch too many times.

*nod*

-Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-12-08  4:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-02 13:37 [PATCH, RFC] rename xfs.h Christoph Hellwig
2025-12-02 13:37 ` [PATCH] xfs: rename xfs.h to xfs_priv.h Christoph Hellwig
2025-12-04  9:04 ` [PATCH, RFC] rename xfs.h Dave Chinner
2025-12-04  9:23   ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-12-04 17:21     ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-12-05  8:12       ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-12-05 16:29         ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-12-08  4:30         ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2025-12-10  6:08   ` Good name for xfs.h/libxfs_priv.h in libxfs Christoph Hellwig
2025-12-10  6:23     ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-12-10 22:51     ` Eric Sandeen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aTZUVTH4pMITncqc@dread.disaster.area \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=cem@kernel.org \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox