From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B39635CBA6 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2025 10:25:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.137.202.133 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1765967129; cv=none; b=DAWOfUD87QqdPTARk593JoZPfWaij7jNK55z/7bFg0wp9ia5d7H/XzadP11XnBpDoxHR9ngV6zArzkDVcuZHR6CIDgyn3o7l3mkWam4we3gNshtooRdCdqycsmLZLxTFRrHx1g39tFd/Xu9y+ZrejNuZV5TPv/yOxhx22uLbrRQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1765967129; c=relaxed/simple; bh=0mjg0dUvFM6WOFNEAaRYyGgeqRXOpcxdJV+Bk3TqUEc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=nkPr8pdu3yzLz4eZMnFN4A0XyPv/7OW1Y1wq3IStDQ2jG5CmrJmVOqRFXzItZT26CZUMcQik1eiEYQGufzBHve1KXSwJ9wXKjVJr4chN9q9GB3vacSNGR8K6Rkwnpn3SEKhAiiKOZGmG5KDDJ74DajbCCcE/kMPol1qzAwqSV9M= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=bombadil.srs.infradead.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b=DFgqODqz; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.137.202.133 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=bombadil.srs.infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="DFgqODqz" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version :References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=1WOAw0qJY4gsi0bXhfIlK7SvRVbFusiduVOf9rYH8yU=; b=DFgqODqzcDV06UW6qmhAsii5rU jjnxk8pUkvsjUnMd2tM4qtGyAmX9WJjhD31oKaVCI130d4ZiQuWa1hwGxE9H07wuVfo6vP7lothmr uIGVS3vRtKctn6JB2IhfrBXEeR/vqMid7olVzCBepAnq9ZVNIrKYS98nHtL9ZYJTYdyc6ZgA6VhOY +ziCBqkCgen1r+oSmsJxSu6+DzFzcsc7m0nLqIKMCzCTrswx96WF8F3nSZSGr4BwRAD4RwK4uhJxb IQuc4l8gvmBsgtE/aoje4NcgOtdupFVMON6o96wEcjQCf82eSFAhWBPgLa2RoDPv984GnkAlEK+CL RYesQYWQ==; Received: from hch by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vVoil-00000006dvs-3BTq; Wed, 17 Dec 2025 10:25:27 +0000 Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2025 02:25:27 -0800 From: Christoph Hellwig To: "Nirjhar Roy (IBM)" Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, ritesh.list@gmail.com, ojaswin@linux.ibm.com, djwong@kernel.org, hch@infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] xfs: Fix the return value of xfs_rtcopy_summary() Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org. See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html On Wed, Dec 17, 2025 at 11:07:42AM +0530, Nirjhar Roy (IBM) wrote: > xfs_rtcopy_summary() should return the appropriate error code > instead of always returning 0. The caller of this function which is > xfs_growfs_rt_bmblock() is already handling the error. > > Signed-off-by: Nirjhar Roy (IBM) Fixes tag?