From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [90.155.50.34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B882532F750; Wed, 21 Jan 2026 05:04:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=90.155.50.34 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768971857; cv=none; b=c9XdpC6uO7xj5ymNdO9Uy/wzvgyhBRDDl3wBQD+1jh7xJD8p3mXJcEX3Fe2nzeArGl31kzh4yeGeUEhvEEKoNeXUDasSqsoV7PB2g4L8HoszxEbaZHidOUlcKYxkKBTMk2HQUZZPHYWVWSMExFsc10c9VvypcWokRBZ0ASyH6CI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768971857; c=relaxed/simple; bh=VA5Noq28tiqekF1L61kBf56ok6a+FePbh6yVWHB54xk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=WR9sakVcYdFXd9JNwAjgKkn9KyCBtJ1RyD5PQTnW7fqPrneLV5rhneCN1+4231IF7ZKqfhCwt49Rv7cWeOOKzPP4nEOfGH04sAXpHl01m6TnUqEGRJDRD+X7kdQweJhIRabgfGfBOChEezAoBdhv/zJ1ZE3Qf+kABmsYuN9LAJs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b=eU/+WL4h; arc=none smtp.client-ip=90.155.50.34 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="eU/+WL4h" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=VA5Noq28tiqekF1L61kBf56ok6a+FePbh6yVWHB54xk=; b=eU/+WL4hdJU9jC9HxsbjUIRtaG BlzmwGdd/wz2JLhHnAzCIx5CZMbPjaqddh/3yR8BhgYXEy7i72+KNA2B8cnDUXvgtw8/s4R1/dxV5 I+WfxpfBBZfCve/h3hzmuP+nqTjEytCNeSgCPGe1firJY/VBKwNnwqLWUDhsKyPJXftYis50SDWOp u/fbvgZlREXFTj4NmzsGkkcKxVQmyM1tyl2P5LSZAdk3ltvPFUzFnaqHVkupsX1IDApM+8PmBiwIw iJ2Xm7+0PeSR8aMnK07KGfFUS3EI+daW4inOpr/p8PnYnoufEYt4Nb39OiXyU3hgXdHPfgMN827PD FaMBOb7A==; Received: from willy by casper.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1viQO1-0000000FuEn-2wQP; Wed, 21 Jan 2026 05:04:09 +0000 Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2026 05:04:09 +0000 From: Matthew Wilcox To: Jiaming Zhang Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" , cem@kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, brauner@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, syzkaller@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [Linux Kernel Bug] general protection fault in xfarray_destroy Message-ID: References: <20260120184647.GW15551@frogsfrogsfrogs> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Wed, Jan 21, 2026 at 12:58:58PM +0800, Jiaming Zhang wrote: > Additionally, all reported issues were discovered by running syzkaller > with our new generated syscall specs :) syzbot has not found these > issues yet because the upstream instance currently lacks these specs. Work with syzkaller upstream to get your changes into syzkaller. It's far more productive, both for you and everybody else involved. Don't be syzbot, you're not nearly as good at being syzbot as syzbot is.