From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8D82383C8F for ; Thu, 5 Mar 2026 13:55:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.137.202.133 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772718916; cv=none; b=TwzKt7KWIt6yPvsfDSH3R1GfQ3RCXEhT2+4/J0iTFrKoYRMoSjY10DXNKOKnMPRPD1cEu3UTwCWb3bzva5/hQ1f7r3P9/ZaMTCY/E7PHA0gkD3PYpKbPH1HLafq4oLVVctF5M3MMiFLcS59rWblcZSGotg1d9AO0QVavzd/O6gM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772718916; c=relaxed/simple; bh=HMSQaKn0lD4x/vvsute6EAj7YULL18+mHi89Pb4SzEI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=NEsgjzbt8MlRINyUqzNHII26GM7kFk0/StYCahMPbOzNTqZAQCwg2M654GX2bPAAoRY6QHufpygKEh26AzFutnD0/XE59adT+6Lr48WgkhQ0xbpyrbUseXrlnENXoLYBUGCNkd5e6+L4xkK7aayqBrND/Bm1V0sgKdM/OswhWyw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=bombadil.srs.infradead.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b=vTlu6N9Q; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.137.202.133 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=bombadil.srs.infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="vTlu6N9Q" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version :References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=RxWnOjCgFctzBTY9tizu9Q7hQav4zfGxWD7WRY4yDAc=; b=vTlu6N9QlSp34/WPDRlnUsMCGj i4S7gRiyLeK8XtFHxu17Q0SkEFcQKlQrwd2izye72/nnm5/pqxmQPbiNaXPNilct2WY25tTovbq93 oFdDIwpNr2rkdiH4ofpLoImorAkWx5QlIT1kaLipOD3nOPQ7Fkm8+TI/XZsfKqbLzanIM7qz6Iye4 pUz0U+6loQ9WvynbnBgka6DhvJaOUpTQI5Vq7AlD6IJdEXp4xro4uNtwDUlOBoKQAitqxRU9cHhNF dAtlD+u63T7Fh5OdQPPUMPQcLYHJgsv+KA0Ek2Yg4DtC7lTDGUES7P8dw32+FohE5YRXK2jM5Yf5b hOkN0Jmg==; Received: from hch by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vy9AV-00000001ufB-1MUL; Thu, 05 Mar 2026 13:55:11 +0000 Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2026 05:55:11 -0800 From: Christoph Hellwig To: "Darrick J. Wong" Cc: Christoph Hellwig , aalbersh@kernel.org, hch@lst.de, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 23/26] xfs_io: print systemd service names Message-ID: References: <177249783165.482027.209169366483011357.stgit@frogsfrogsfrogs> <177249783711.482027.11261039889156364110.stgit@frogsfrogsfrogs> <20260303172916.GR57948@frogsfrogsfrogs> <20260304163502.GV57948@frogsfrogsfrogs> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260304163502.GV57948@frogsfrogsfrogs> X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org. See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html On Wed, Mar 04, 2026 at 08:35:02AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > On Wed, Mar 04, 2026 at 05:04:18AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 03, 2026 at 09:29:16AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > > (That was a long way of saying "can't we just keep using xfs_io as a > > > dumping ground for QA-related xfs stuff?" ;)) > > > > I really hate messing it up with things that are no I/O at all, > > and not related to issuing I/O or related syscalls. Maybe just add > > a new little binary for it? > > How about xfs_db, since normal users shouldn't need to compute the > service unit names? Still seems totally out of place for something not touching the on-disk structures. What's the problem with adding a new trivial binary for it? Or even just publishing the name in a file in /usr/share?