From: Dave Chinner <dgc@kernel.org>
To: "Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)" <pankaj.raghav@linux.dev>
Cc: Lukas Herbolt <lukas@herbolt.com>,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, cem@kernel.org, hch@infradead.org,
djwong@kernel.org, p.raghav@samsung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 2/2] xfs: add FALLOC_FL_WRITE_ZEROES to XFS code base
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2026 10:49:44 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <abdFmEn7lQKqqbv1@dread> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <my5vghqmg4npgqpunilj3btbgrvr2s4dbqkm2j6cpw2l3tccrk@p3h3scnzwz6o>
On Thu, Mar 12, 2026 at 09:36:50PM +0000, Pankaj Raghav (Samsung) wrote:
> > > +
> > > + len = round_up(offset + len, blksize) - round_down(offset, blksize);
> > > + offset = round_down(offset, blksize);
> > > + error = xfs_alloc_file_space(ip, offset, len, XFS_BMAPI_PREALLOC);
> >
> > xfs_alloc_file_space() already rounds the offset down and the range
> > end upwards to block size boundaries (XFS_B_TO_FSBT() rounds down,
> > XFS_B_TO_FSB rounds up). There is no need to do it here.
> >
> > > +
> > > +set_filesize:
> > > + if (error)
> > > + return error;
> > > +
> > > + error = xfs_falloc_setsize(file, new_size);
> > > + if (error)
> > > + return error;
> > > + if (need_convert)
> > > + error = xfs_alloc_file_space(ip, offset, len,
> > > + XFS_BMAPI_CONVERT | XFS_BMAPI_ZERO);
> > > + return error;
> >
> > Honestly, this "prealloc, set file size, then convert and zero" thing
> > seems a bit ... clunky.
> >
> > I mean, this is trying to work around an issue with
> > xfs_falloc_setsize() operating on written extents beyond EOF to set
> > EOF. But why are we even using a generic truncate operation to set
> > the EOF when we have already done most of the complex truncate work
> > (exclusion, page cache invalidation, extent removal, etc) already?
>
> I agree.
>
> >
> > My logic:
> >
> > xfs_bmapi_write(off, len, XFS_BMAPI_ZERO) will allocate all the
> > holes and delalloc extents over the given range as written extents
> > that are initialised to contain zeroes.
> >
> > xfs_bmapi_write(off, len, XFS_BMAPI_CONVERT) will convert all the
> > unwritten extents over a given range to written extents, but will
> > not touch the data in those extents.
> >
> > xfs_bmapi_write(off, len, XFS_BMAPI_CONVERT | XFS_BMAPI_ZERO) will
> > allocate holes and delalloc extents and convert unwritten extents
> > all to written extents, and it will write zeros to all of those
> > extents.
> >
> > This latter case is exactly what we want, and if gives us zeroes on
> > disk to the end of the extent beyond the new EOF. i.e. we've
> > completed all the data IO, and so now all we need
> > to do is update the file size transactionally, just like we do in
> > IO completion.
> >
> > Indeed, xfs_iomap_write_unwritten() integrates this size update
> > into post-IO unwritten extent conversion. i.e we already have code
> > that does exactly what we need, except for tweaking the
> > xfs_bmapi_write() flags for the zeroing behaviour we need.
>
> This makes sense.
>
> >
> > So, a helper function in fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c such as this:
> >
> > /*
> > * This function is used to allocate written extents over holes
> > * and/or convert unwritten extents to written extents based on the
> > * @flags passed to it.
> > *
> > * If @flags is zero, if will allocate written extents for holes and
>
> s/zero/XFS_BMAPI_ZERO ?
No, I explicitly meant flags = 0.
> > * delalloc extents across the range.
> > *
> > * If XFS_BMAPI_CONVERT is specified in @flags, then it will also do
> > * conversion of unwritten extents in the range to written extents.
> > *
> > * If XFS_BMAPI_ZERO is specified in @flags, then both newly
>
> s/XFS_BMAPI_ZERO/(XFS_BMAPI_ZERO | XFS_BMAPI_CONVERT) ?
No I explictly describing what happens when you do "flags |=
XFS_BMAPI_ZERO;" to any other xfs_bmapi_write() operation
flag specification.
i.e. XFS_BMAPI_ZERO is an optional behavioural modifier for
allocation and/or unwritten extent conversion operations. i.e all it
does is add initialisation of the new/modified extents to contain
real zeroes.
e.g. flags = 0 means "allocate holes/delalloc as uninitialised
written extents". flags = 0 | XFS_BMAPI_ZERO
means "allocate holes/delalloc and initialise them to contain
zeros". Unwritten extents will not be modified by either operation.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
dgc@kernel.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-15 23:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-09 18:12 [PATCH v11 2/2] xfs: add FALLOC_FL_WRITE_ZEROES to XFS code base Lukas Herbolt
2026-03-10 0:44 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-03-10 10:10 ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2026-03-10 11:22 ` Lukas Herbolt
2026-03-10 15:02 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-03-10 10:20 ` Lukas Herbolt
2026-03-10 14:57 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-03-11 0:12 ` Dave Chinner
2026-03-12 21:36 ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2026-03-15 23:49 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2026-03-16 7:23 ` Pankaj Raghav
2026-03-16 5:03 ` Lukas Herbolt
2026-03-17 12:20 ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=abdFmEn7lQKqqbv1@dread \
--to=dgc@kernel.org \
--cc=cem@kernel.org \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@herbolt.com \
--cc=p.raghav@samsung.com \
--cc=pankaj.raghav@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox