public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Long Li <leo.lilong@huawei.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: <cem@kernel.org>, <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	<david@fromorbit.com>, <yi.zhang@huawei.com>,
	<houtao1@huawei.com>, <yangerkun@huawei.com>,
	<lonuxli.64@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] xfs: close crash window in attr dabtree inactivation
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2026 16:32:35 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <abfAIz5yfqdG8SgR@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260316045613.GU1770774@frogsfrogsfrogs>

On Sun, Mar 15, 2026 at 09:56:13PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2026 at 05:18:56PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 12, 2026 at 04:58:00PM +0800, Long Li wrote:
> > > When inactivating an inode with node-format extended attributes,
> > > xfs_attr3_node_inactive() invalidates all child leaf/node blocks via
> > > xfs_trans_binval(), but intentionally does not remove the corresponding
> > > entries from their parent node blocks.  The implicit assumption is that
> > > xfs_attr_inactive() will truncate the entire attr fork to zero extents
> > > afterwards, so log recovery will never reach the root node and follow
> > > those stale pointers.
> > > 
> > > However, if a log shutdown occurs after the leaf/node block cancellations
> > > commit but before the attr bmap truncation commits, this assumption
> > > breaks.  Recovery replays the attr bmap intact (the inode still has
> > > attr fork extents), but suppresses replay of all cancelled leaf/node
> > > blocks, maybe leaving them as stale data on disk.  On the next mount,
> > > xlog_recover_process_iunlinks() retries inactivation and attempts to
> > > read the root node via the attr bmap. If the root node was not replayed,
> > > reading the unreplayed root block triggers a metadata verification
> > > failure immediately; if it was replayed, following its child pointers
> > > to unreplayed child blocks triggers the same failure:
> > > 
> > >  XFS (pmem0): Metadata corruption detected at
> > >  xfs_da3_node_read_verify+0x53/0x220, xfs_da3_node block 0x78
> > >  XFS (pmem0): Unmount and run xfs_repair
> > >  XFS (pmem0): First 128 bytes of corrupted metadata buffer:
> > >  00000000: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ................
> > >  00000010: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ................
> > >  00000020: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ................
> > >  00000030: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ................
> > >  00000040: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ................
> > >  00000050: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ................
> > >  00000060: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ................
> > >  00000070: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ................
> > >  XFS (pmem0): metadata I/O error in "xfs_da_read_buf+0x104/0x190" at daddr 0x78 len 8 error 117
> > > 
> > > Fix this in two places:
> > > 
> > > In xfs_attr3_node_inactive(), after calling xfs_trans_binval() on a
> > > child block, immediately remove the entry that references it from the
> > > parent node in the same transaction.  This eliminates the window where
> > > the parent holds a pointer to a cancelled block.  Once all children are
> > > removed, the now-empty root node is converted to a leaf block within the
> > > same transaction. This node-to-leaf conversion is necessary for crash
> > > safety. If the system shutdown after the empty node is written to the
> > > log but before the second-phase bmap truncation commits, log recovery
> > > will attempt to verify the root block on disk. xfs_da3_node_verify()
> > > does not permit a node block with count == 0; such a block will fail
> > > verification and trigger a metadata corruption shutdown. on the other
> > > hand, leaf blocks are allowed to have this transient state.
> > > 
> > > In xfs_attr_inactive(), split the attr fork truncation into two explicit
> > > phases.  First, truncate all extents beyond the root block (the child
> > > extents whose parent references have already been removed above).
> > > Second, invalidate the root block and truncate the attr bmap to zero in
> > > a single transaction.  The two operations in the second phase must be
> > > atomic: as long as the attr bmap has any non-zero length, recovery can
> > > follow it to the root block, so the root block invalidation must commit
> > > together with the bmap-to-zero truncation.
> > > 
> > > Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
> > > Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Long Li <leo.lilong@huawei.com>
> > 
> > I think this looks ok, but let me run it through g753 over the weekend
> > to see if it fixes that problem too.  Thanks for answering my questions
> > the last time through.
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
> 
> In retesting generic/753, I noticed that this patchset *does* actually
> fix the problem of xfs_repair complaining about random contents in attr
> block 0.  So, I think you've fixed that problem, yay!
> 

That sounds great, thank you for the test.

> However, I noticed an additional thing -- if attr block 0 happened to be
> a leaf node (i.e. not a da3 node) AND that leaf happened to contain a
> non-INCOMPLETE remote attr entry AND the fs went down after the first
> bunmapi (that removes all but block0) but before the second bunmapi
> (which eliminates block 0), that remote entry will point to blocks
> that have been bunmapi'd, and xfs_repair will complain about that too.
> 
> So, I think this patch needs to reinit old leaf blocks too; see below.

Agree with you, thanks for pointint this out. 

For non-root leaf blocks, the remote value block cancellation and the
removal of the leaf entry from its parent node are already in the same
transaction, so that case is safe.

For the root leaf block, it is reachable as long as the attr bmap is
non-zero, so the remote value block cancellations and the leaf reinit
must be atomic.

> Note that xfs_repair also needs a patch to teach it not to zap the
> entire attr fork just because it found one incomplete attr entry in a
> leaf block.
> 
> Thoughts?

With the leaf reinit added, xfs_repair maybe encounter an empty leaf at
block 0 with no entries referencing the remote blocks. So I don't understand
under what circumstances there would be an "incomplete attr entry", perhaps
I missed something?

Thanks,
Long Li


  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-16  8:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-12  8:57 [PATCH v2 0/4] xfs: close crash window in attr dabtree inactivation Long Li
2026-03-12  8:57 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] xfs: only assert new size for datafork during truncate extents Long Li
2026-03-12  8:57 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] xfs: factor out xfs_attr3_node_entry_remove Long Li
2026-03-13 15:01   ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-03-14  2:49     ` Long Li
2026-03-12  8:57 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] xfs: factor out xfs_attr3_leaf_init Long Li
2026-03-13 15:04   ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-03-14  2:47     ` Long Li
2026-03-12  8:58 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] xfs: close crash window in attr dabtree inactivation Long Li
2026-03-14  0:18   ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-03-16  4:56     ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-03-16  8:32       ` Long Li [this message]
2026-03-16 13:04         ` Long Li
2026-03-16 16:29         ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-03-17  1:38           ` Long Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=abfAIz5yfqdG8SgR@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=leo.lilong@huawei.com \
    --cc=cem@kernel.org \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=houtao1@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lonuxli.64@gmail.com \
    --cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
    --cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox