public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>,
	Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: buffer cache simplification v4
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2026 08:13:04 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ablFUL_cBSJBJHgp@bfoster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260316154216.1598410-1-hch@lst.de>

On Mon, Mar 16, 2026 at 04:41:32PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> this series has a few old patches that simplify the LRU handling, and
> moves back to only having a per-buftarg hash now that the buffer hash
> is using the scalable rhashtable.  While some of this looks like
> performance work, performance and scalability is unchanged even on the
> 80 core dual socket system I test this on.  Besides cleaning up the
> code nice, it also happens to fix a syzcaller reported use after free
> during buffer shutdown, which happened incidentally because of how the
> tear down of the buftarg vs the perag structures is handled.
> 
> Changes since v3:
>  - split the change to handling how referenced buffers on the LRU
>    are handled into a separate patch
> 

It looks like there's a patch ordering problem or something here. It
doesn't apply to master, and looks like patch 1 is trying to modify
hunks that don't yet exist. A local rebase issue related to reordering
the change in patch 3 perhaps..?

Brian

> Changes since v2:
>  - mark b_hold as signed in patch 1 before removing it in patch 2
>  - document the changed locking in xfs_buf_rele_cached.
> 
> Changes since v2:
>  - add more details and a link to a commit message
> 
> Diffstat:
>  libxfs/xfs_ag.c |   13 ----
>  libxfs/xfs_ag.h |    2 
>  xfs_buf.c       |  148 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------------------------
>  xfs_buf.h       |   14 +----
>  xfs_buf_mem.c   |   11 ----
>  xfs_trace.h     |   10 +--
>  6 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 132 deletions(-)
> 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-03-17 12:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-16 15:41 buffer cache simplification v4 Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-16 15:41 ` [PATCH 1/3] xfs: use a lockref for the buffer reference count Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-16 15:41 ` [PATCH 2/3] xfs: switch (back) to a per-buftarg buffer hash Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-16 22:30   ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-03-16 15:41 ` [PATCH 3/3] xfs: don't decrement the buffer LRU count for in-use buffers Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-16 22:20   ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-03-17 12:13 ` Brian Foster [this message]
2026-03-17 12:56   ` buffer cache simplification v4 Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-17 13:36     ` Brian Foster
2026-03-17 13:39       ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ablFUL_cBSJBJHgp@bfoster \
    --to=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=cem@kernel.org \
    --cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox