From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: Lukas Herbolt <lukas@herbolt.com>,
sandeen@sandeen.net, aalbersh@kernel.org,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] mkfs: allow specification of default options via configuration file
Date: Tue, 19 May 2026 01:43:28 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <agwisMUPPeYa5qDM@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260514150653.GW9555@frogsfrogsfrogs>
On Thu, May 14, 2026 at 08:06:53AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
>
> Ted asked for the ability to set default mkfs options, but to retain the
> ability respecify options via a separate configuration file or cli
> options. This would be useful for running fstests with the default
> featureset of (say) Linux 5.15 LTS, while still allowing individual
> testcases to provide their own overrides. It's certainly less messy
> than what Ted does today, which is a bash script that copies the desired
> config file and changes things.
Looks reasonable, do you have a test for it as well?
> +static inline int
> +getopt_mkfs(
I don't think there's much of a point in the inline here.
> + int argc,
> + char *const argv[],
> + const struct option *longopts,
> + int *longindex)
> +{
> + return getopt_long(argc, argv, "b:c:d:i:l:L:m:n:KNp:qr:s:CfV",
> + longopts, longindex);
> +}
Why does this hardcode the short options, but requires the caller to
pass in the long options (which are the same for both callers)?
> + while ((c = getopt_mkfs(argc, argv, long_options, &option_index)) != EOF) {
Killing the long_opts would also avoid the overly long line here and in
the other call site.
> + if (c == 'c') {
> + parse_subopts(c, optarg, defcfg_subopt_tab, &cli);
> + }
Spurious braces.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-19 8:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-14 15:06 [RFC PATCH] mkfs: allow specification of default options via configuration file Darrick J. Wong
2026-05-19 8:43 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2026-05-19 14:10 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=agwisMUPPeYa5qDM@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=aalbersh@kernel.org \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@herbolt.com \
--cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox