From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB3B22980A8; Mon, 29 Jun 2026 18:00:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1782756017; cv=none; b=CieLhbq7l/t3q7lCO2LIo4Pd0lFejTl14fm1VLqJtbvViO72zW/Q78f/GL6nSLN+GRtnlkCDQPyodOg5EhG6W35IKtqn4DoQLwKHOl56CBYs2Bv4gpZ/PhL9PUwq8A+t5kmAtLAfOIl3KevHg2+Dsvq6KE8VvKBv0kAgXn0bhR4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1782756017; c=relaxed/simple; bh=sIG75y5yRyz6iyGR0gFdgnRLe5u/851DT2ULuAj8/vM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=eE910ORcyLeInmjOjetuEs9vvgdAjl8GIIAWfpDFyQXqGTpxrKlLv9V2OctfuLRelXEPY9uP8nzie8CrVPb+hMRhguNZyrVgtt83kYA6GVb638AC9l3Rm9m1E8d7PTPGE6SnZxV2eoizIAsm9D4AukhXJe9uV/TLZ+L7MpECuTI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=XFaCoqtz; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="XFaCoqtz" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 643C41F000E9; Mon, 29 Jun 2026 18:00:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1782756016; bh=9juhSUvCWu8l6tUw8+3omrLG1Yhz3U+/V/oBXIniBa8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=XFaCoqtz3BOhVSiRY8l2WfFNT9R50f5hd4o2gW6WhHZFamrXWfkghNdcsWE22BSX0 fL7An+HRKHyWUZI9W90R4Ye8F4Ao4wa+ipRK3BpGNUGn9eIrgiil1u3O3D+Gq6uJ0t 3NlMPpQoB2RoCUfyWI/ET6/FK2E/yQ4G2Kzr+/rjKpWb9nPGvLRNWLYgvAxh/CG2KA 59zJIrQioyO83oJjxY00uCky0medAbKOVq9+dtbcTk+k/0LrpXlhXf4vPosVrhf+4f wI/zpKIR+FPIgA+CKB7qk7X7pVXQ53nShW7ChdfVtS+KJGMlELz7BdyF9VjhtCQ1lD iuW4ShIY45eIg== Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2026 02:00:10 +0800 From: Zorro Lang To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" , Lukas Herbolt , Eric Sandeen , Shin'ichiro Kawasaki , linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, fstests@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfs/216: disable all concurrency scaling Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , "Darrick J. Wong" , Lukas Herbolt , Eric Sandeen , Shin'ichiro Kawasaki , linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, fstests@vger.kernel.org References: <20260619050937.444488-1-hch@lst.de> <20260619050937.444488-3-hch@lst.de> <20260626045353.GA8735@lst.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260626045353.GA8735@lst.de> On Fri, Jun 26, 2026 at 06:53:53AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > I'll retract this patch in favour of the btrfs fix from Darrick. > We'll still need patch 1, though. Let me make sure I have the current status mapped out correctly. So we should apply/merge the following patches: [PATCH 1/2] common/xfs: fix _scratch_mkfs_xfs_supports_concurrency [PATCH 2/2] xfs/21[67]: fix mkfs log concurrency detection [PATCH 1/2] xfs/078: disable all concurrency scaling And revert: [PATCH 2/2] xfs/216: disable all concurrency scaling Is that correct? >