public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>
To: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: 2.6.38.4: xfs speed problem?
Date: Sat, 7 May 2011 12:09:46 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1105071042210.20162@p34.internal.lan> (raw)

Hello,

Using 2.6.38.4 on two hosts:

Host 1:
$ /usr/bin/time find geocities.data 1> /dev/null
80.92user 417.93system 2:19:07elapsed 5%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 105520maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (0major+73373minor)pagefaults 0swaps

# xfs_db -c frag -f /dev/sda1
actual 40203982, ideal 40088075, fragmentation factor 0.29%

meta-data=/dev/sda1              isize=256    agcount=44, agsize=268435455 blks
          =                       sectsz=512   attr=2
data     =                       bsize=4096   blocks=11718704640, imaxpct=5
          =                       sunit=0      swidth=0 blks
naming   =version 2              bsize=4096   ascii-ci=0
log      =internal               bsize=4096   blocks=521728, version=2
          =                       sectsz=512   sunit=0 blks, lazy-count=1
realtime =none                   extsz=4096   blocks=0, rtextents=0

--

Host 2:
$ /usr/bin/time find geocities.data 1>/dev/null
54.60user 337.20system 48:42.71elapsed 13%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 105632maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (1major+72981minor)pagefaults 0swaps

# xfs_db -c frag -f /dev/sdb1
actual 37998306, ideal 37939331, fragmentation factor 0.16%

meta-data=/dev/sdb1              isize=256    agcount=10, agsize=268435455 blks
          =                       sectsz=512   attr=2
data     =                       bsize=4096   blocks=2441379328, imaxpct=5
          =                       sunit=0      swidth=0 blks
naming   =version 2              bsize=4096   ascii-ci=0
log      =internal               bsize=4096   blocks=521728, version=2
          =                       sectsz=512   sunit=0 blks, lazy-count=1
realtime =none                   extsz=4096   blocks=0, rtextents=0


--

Host 1: RAID-6 (7200 RPM Drives, 18+1 hot spare)
Host 2: RAID-6 (7200 RPM Drives, 12)

Each system uses a 3ware 9750-24i4e controller, same settings.

Any thoughts why one is > 2x faster than the other?

Justin.

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

             reply	other threads:[~2011-05-07 16:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-07 16:09 Justin Piszcz [this message]
2011-05-08  0:33 ` 2.6.38.4: xfs speed problem? Dave Chinner
2011-05-08 17:18   ` Stan Hoeppner
2011-05-09  7:53     ` Michael Monnerie

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.02.1105071042210.20162@p34.internal.lan \
    --to=jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox