From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:33274 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752375AbdKMM0O (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Nov 2017 07:26:14 -0500 Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 13:26:06 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [1/7] Documentation: Add license-rules.rst to describe how to properly identify file licenses In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20171112192142.525567667@linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-xfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: List-Id: xfs To: Charlemagne Lasse Cc: LKML , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Jonathan Corbet , Philippe Ombredanne , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Christoph Hellwig , Russell King , Rob Herring , Jonas Oberg , Joe Perches , linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Kate Stewart , Carmen Bianca Bakker On Mon, 13 Nov 2017, Charlemagne Lasse wrote: > > +If a specific tool cannot handle the standard comment style, then the > > +appropriate comment mechanism which the tool accepts shall be used. > > Most of the things sound good. But I really don't get the first-line > thing and the C++ single line comments in C sources. That's been a decision from Linus and probably not going to change, even if you argue in circles. Thanks, tglx