From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:47306 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933329AbdKPSDt (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Nov 2017 13:03:49 -0500 Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 19:03:38 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [patch 1/7] Documentation: Add license-rules.rst to describe how to properly identify file licenses In-Reply-To: <20171116151540.GA18500@silk.coyote.org> Message-ID: References: <20171112191821.240484206@linutronix.de> <20171112192142.525567667@linutronix.de> <20171116080723.279591c8@lwn.net> <20171116151540.GA18500@silk.coyote.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-xfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: List-Id: xfs To: Jonas Oberg Cc: Jonathan Corbet , LKML , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Philippe Ombredanne , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Christoph Hellwig , Russell King , Rob Herring , Joe Perches , linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Kate Stewart On Thu, 16 Nov 2017, Jonas Oberg wrote: > > One other thing that occurred to me is that documentation files, too, > > are copyrightable and should have license identifiers. > > Would it make sense to take an incremental approach to this? Get the > source code and identifiers worked on by Thomas et al through first, then > think about and fix up potential other issues, like the top level COPYING > file, or documentation :-) The top level COPYING file is historic, in terms of computer age even palaeontologic. We can't fix it :) Thanks, tglx