From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:47825 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934269AbdKPTZR (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Nov 2017 14:25:17 -0500 Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 20:25:10 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [patch V2 00/11] LICENSES: Add documentation and initial License files In-Reply-To: <20171116183306.103584007@linutronix.de> Message-ID: References: <20171116183306.103584007@linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-xfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: List-Id: xfs To: LKML Cc: Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Jonathan Corbet , Kate Stewart , Philippe Ombredanne , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Christoph Hellwig , Russell King , Rob Herring , Jonas Oberg , Joe Perches , linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Charlemagne Lasse , Carmen Bianca Bakker On Thu, 16 Nov 2017, Thomas Gleixner wrote: Sorry, I was too stupid to fixup Kate's e-mail address after Joe pointed it out. My apologies. Please remove 'kate@linuxfoundation.org' from the CC list and replace it with 'kstewart@linuxfoundation.org' /me goes off to rumage for brown paperbags > This is the second version of the licensing rules documentation. > > Changes since v1 [1]: > > - Addressing the review comments from Jon, Joe and Jonas: > > - Moved the documentation file into Documentation/process, but kept the > topic entry in the top level index file so it stands out. (Joe) > > - Changed the license file metatags so they are not overloading > SPDX-License-Identifier (Jonas) > > - Cleaned up the inconsistencies in the document (Jon, Joe) > > - Added the comment style fior .rst files (Jon) > > - Added a few more links and cursed restructured text to make it render > halfways sensible. > > - Added the license files for the SPDX tags which are already in tree and > moved GPL-1.0 to the 'other' directory as it really does not belong into > the preferrred category. > > - Removed the Reviewed-by tags as they not longer apply. > > Please go over it with a fine comb again. I'm sure that I screwed up > something on the way, but me staring more at it doesn't help. > > Thanks to everyone who provided input! > > It turned out that the original approach was incidentaly close to what the > FSFE REUSE initiative docuemented and I think we are now nearing the point > where we can wear the REUSE sticker if Jonas does not find any other holes > in it. :) > > Thanks, > > tglx > > > [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171112191821.240484206@linutronix.de > > >