From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D63D77F63 for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 06:12:25 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7A3E304032 for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 04:12:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id DYx4xv4WrEAMxQwa for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 04:12:22 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 13:08:12 +0100 (CET) From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Luk=E1=A8_Czerner?= Subject: Re: Xfs fails in xfstests 013 In-Reply-To: <20130210221600.GC8257@dastard> Message-ID: References: <20130201002927.GJ32297@disturbed.disaster> <20130203230013.GI2667@dastard> <20130210221600.GC8257@dastard> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="-1463785984-570699168-1360584732=:2315" List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Luk=E1=A8_Czerner?= , xfs@oss.sgi.com This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. ---1463785984-570699168-1360584732=:2315 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Mon, 11 Feb 2013, Dave Chinner wrote: > Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 09:16:00 +1100 > From: Dave Chinner > To: Lukáš Czerner > Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com > Subject: Re: Xfs fails in xfstests 013 > > On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 10:00:13AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 03:33:06PM +0100, Lukáš Czerner wrote: > > > On Fri, 1 Feb 2013, Lukáš Czerner wrote: > > > and I have not hit the assert. However I think that I know what's > > > going on. The verifier is obviously not attached when the symlink is > > > created, however it is attached when security attributes are created > > > for the symlink by xfs_init_security(). > > > > Which means the bug is in xfs_bmap_add_attrfork_local() in calling > > xfs_bmap_local_to_extents(). i.e it assumes that the local data is > > either directory data or extent data, and is attaching extent tree > > verifiers to the buffer that contains a remote symlink. Thinking > > time now needed, as this affects the symlink CRC changes as well. > > > > Thanks for the debug help, Lukas. > > Lukas, can you check whether the patch below fixes the problem you > saw? Hi Dave, from my testing it seems that ti fixes the problem. Can not reproduce it anymore with the patch applied. Thanks! -Lukas > > Cheers, > > Dave. > ---1463785984-570699168-1360584732=:2315 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs ---1463785984-570699168-1360584732=:2315--