From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B046B7F3F for ; Wed, 14 May 2014 08:20:46 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74DD18F8050 for ; Wed, 14 May 2014 06:20:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id EfxtJwFdGVsCEIgq for ; Wed, 14 May 2014 06:20:42 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 15:20:24 +0200 (CEST) From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Luk=E1=A8_Czerner?= Subject: Separate mailing list for xfstests Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: dchinner@redhat.com Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com Hi Dave, I am wondering whether you're open to the idea of creating separate mailing list for xfstests. It is no longer xfs specific project and even though you're still a maintainer of the project, other fs folks are definitely interested in the development process, but not everyone might be interested in receiving everything from the xfs@oss.sgi.com list. To speak for myself I would like to help with review of xfstests patches as well, but I rarely go through my xfs folder unfortunately. linux-fsdevel might seem as a good candidate for it, but still I think that it deserves a separate ML to point people to. What do you think ? Thanks! -Lukas _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs