public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ales Novak <alnovak@suse.cz>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: fix in the setting of logbsize
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2015 17:09:40 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.03.1507031703450.24061@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150606223200.GZ24666@dastard>

On 2015-6-7 00:32, Dave Chinner wrote:

> On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 06:03:53PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> On 6/5/15 5:22 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 03:28:45PM +0200, Ales Novak wrote:
>>>> However, this rule is only mentioned in the documentation, while it
>>>> could be checked during the mount.
>>>
>>> Where in the documentation is that mentioned?
>>
>> Documentation/filesystems/xfs.txt:
>>
>>   logbsize=value
>>         Set the size of each in-memory log buffer.  The size may be
>>         specified in bytes, or in kilobytes with a "k" suffix.
>>         Valid sizes for version 1 and version 2 logs are 16384 (16k)
>>         and 32768 (32k).  Valid sizes for version 2 logs also
>>         include 65536 (64k), 131072 (128k) and 262144 (256k). The
>>         logbsize must be an integer multiple of the log
>>         stripe unit configured at mkfs time.
>
> Ah, ok. I'll need to look at the history of that, because I think I
> can see what it is intended to mean, but the "power-of-two" sizes
> that are enforced will also enforce the "integer multiple" part,
> too. I think it was more intended for people using wierd stripe
> units (e.g. 96k) to say the equivalent on 2x96k is a valid log
> buffer size. I suspect we need to revisit both the code and the
> documentation here....

So, how will we proceed here? I understand that my patch only somehow 
blindly implements the restriction mentioned in the documentation and that 
proper solution would mean completely reworking these restrictions; 
however I don't like the state where setting seemingly harmless 
option leads to kernel crash (and possibly fs corruption).

While I understand that only playful root would do that.

-- 
Ales Novak

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2015-07-03 15:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-05 13:28 [PATCH] xfs: fix in the setting of logbsize Ales Novak
2015-06-05 22:22 ` Dave Chinner
2015-06-05 23:03   ` Eric Sandeen
2015-06-06 22:32     ` Dave Chinner
2015-07-03 15:09       ` Ales Novak [this message]
2015-06-07  9:16   ` Ales Novak
2015-06-08 13:04     ` Mark Tinguely
2015-06-25 22:58       ` Ales Novak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LSU.2.03.1507031703450.24061@suse.cz \
    --to=alnovak@suse.cz \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox