From: Ales Novak <alnovak@suse.cz>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: fix in the setting of logbsize
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2015 17:09:40 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.03.1507031703450.24061@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150606223200.GZ24666@dastard>
On 2015-6-7 00:32, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 06:03:53PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> On 6/5/15 5:22 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 03:28:45PM +0200, Ales Novak wrote:
>>>> However, this rule is only mentioned in the documentation, while it
>>>> could be checked during the mount.
>>>
>>> Where in the documentation is that mentioned?
>>
>> Documentation/filesystems/xfs.txt:
>>
>> logbsize=value
>> Set the size of each in-memory log buffer. The size may be
>> specified in bytes, or in kilobytes with a "k" suffix.
>> Valid sizes for version 1 and version 2 logs are 16384 (16k)
>> and 32768 (32k). Valid sizes for version 2 logs also
>> include 65536 (64k), 131072 (128k) and 262144 (256k). The
>> logbsize must be an integer multiple of the log
>> stripe unit configured at mkfs time.
>
> Ah, ok. I'll need to look at the history of that, because I think I
> can see what it is intended to mean, but the "power-of-two" sizes
> that are enforced will also enforce the "integer multiple" part,
> too. I think it was more intended for people using wierd stripe
> units (e.g. 96k) to say the equivalent on 2x96k is a valid log
> buffer size. I suspect we need to revisit both the code and the
> documentation here....
So, how will we proceed here? I understand that my patch only somehow
blindly implements the restriction mentioned in the documentation and that
proper solution would mean completely reworking these restrictions;
however I don't like the state where setting seemingly harmless
option leads to kernel crash (and possibly fs corruption).
While I understand that only playful root would do that.
--
Ales Novak
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-03 15:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-05 13:28 [PATCH] xfs: fix in the setting of logbsize Ales Novak
2015-06-05 22:22 ` Dave Chinner
2015-06-05 23:03 ` Eric Sandeen
2015-06-06 22:32 ` Dave Chinner
2015-07-03 15:09 ` Ales Novak [this message]
2015-06-07 9:16 ` Ales Novak
2015-06-08 13:04 ` Mark Tinguely
2015-06-25 22:58 ` Ales Novak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LSU.2.03.1507031703450.24061@suse.cz \
--to=alnovak@suse.cz \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox