From: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] xfs: dedupe realtime rmap btree code
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2026 20:17:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <arF0f9HTnMfcBo2M@cronus.toxiclabs.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9d77197e-4d5e-49f3-a7cf-fdaf33c285cf@sandeen.net>
On Mon, Sep 21, 2026 at 12:56:58PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 9/21/26 3:24 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 20, 2026 at 08:40:03PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> >> In general this looks good to me, though I'll add that the same sort of
> >> code deduplication could likely be done to the refcount btree code too.
> >
> > I thought the same while reading over the patches. Also the exported
> > in patch 1 threw me off, but it didn't actually export anything.
> >
> > I'd be tempted to just merge the two patches as that's easier to follow,
> > but otherwise this looks good to me:
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Oh, ok - I can merge them if folks prefer. (I kinda thought a prep patch
> / use patch was simpler to follow but I really don't care either way.)
>
> And yeah, you're both right about the refcount code, I should have thought
> of that. It's much shorter functions and my duplicate code scan was looking
> for bigger chunks, but I didn't fully engage my brain.
>
> Happy to send V2 with both, and merge each into a single patch if that's
> what people want.
This sounds like a good plan for me :)
For the code in these patches though:
Reviewed-by: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com>
>
> -Eric
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-21 18:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-18 18:01 [PATCH 0/2] xfs: dedupe realtime rmap btree code Eric Sandeen
2026-09-18 18:01 ` [PATCH 1/2] xfs: export several rmap btree key/record ops Eric Sandeen
2026-09-18 18:01 ` [PATCH 2/2] xfs: use the shared rmap btree ops for the rt rmap btree Eric Sandeen
2026-09-21 3:40 ` [PATCH 0/2] xfs: dedupe realtime rmap btree code Darrick J. Wong
2026-09-21 8:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-21 17:56 ` Eric Sandeen
2026-09-21 18:17 ` Carlos Maiolino [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=arF0f9HTnMfcBo2M@cronus.toxiclabs.cc \
--to=cem@kernel.org \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox