From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DCF94963A5; Wed, 7 Oct 2026 13:03:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.137.202.133 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791378203; cv=none; b=bMicikXqjeCGEEEgP66LeQLzFXA5TrEFZZ8xSHkddN8bAi55NPAWLKrDckL3wcBQPQhkrUt7D6Lloq5NisR0s4gRj7pRvtyVBOUiijSo2Ovi654JBwxowF4Bt5sWeueTheDal/WPBo0yhfX3/Jy8TLGlG4X0vvYFgTaHXkMLNes= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791378203; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Dxa65TX+R9xlWtNfvd1Fa9OTl9CBnXU67J1Ex1ZGmjI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Th471aSU1udcBZpb9U13sRa5ydbrWmw6dzaY2la3m3X6D2D2OzdEgSETzbuK3yOq7CFNRhUE26+WMOdQr/S99kZ10xRqEmw4BEXJxm1U0pPc3iz2NHKwNzXgG9Ufl8DS+V0awNNhHnGcDdLHNcvMe5Jye5rnySJk8inyb7ccr/4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=bombadil.srs.infradead.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b=vcvLAjfr; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.137.202.133 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=bombadil.srs.infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="vcvLAjfr" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version :References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=J8GMn5fNilyReS0npX+1jO4nH6NPnzCUc4qMna1XsbE=; b=vcvLAjfrNE4GdxmWM/1tuqpkoO dr/2hqfXE3RXHczJV3zkjwsky71IwH2dJSUci/62s4N8aot66cZtxdYYWZQpxCsyepq1XE2t1KOmX jndLz6WIWkKkD/2HSEmEAxyqz3I9i4nsFEa9Knc2azaJA/rZ//OV5qKUAUDTYFefbU/DUOOatU8ko +Z1gefIwolRupWZ1gEKOYlsbyxpypBOa8tage8oWdH5dwFEoWzYs0SiX0YBpwdrXkak2ytNZ4gpPP ELn68dsYiirYGZQ50SXnEEEBrgn9446xOBdKzGRvsZTqha9uhIWLUXV3H8X3voqVFpKZXRuj2VPd/ KtLxV6WA==; Received: from hch by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1xERIU-00000002Uyi-1Lyx; Wed, 07 Oct 2026 13:03:02 +0000 Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2026 06:03:02 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig To: "Darrick J. Wong" Cc: cem@kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/12] xfs: flag excessive delalloc rt extents as corruption Message-ID: References: <179117964931.614350.8529263328378685172.stgit@frogsfrogsfrogs> <179117965030.614350.6588199428729564800.stgit@frogsfrogsfrogs> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <179117965030.614350.6588199428729564800.stgit@frogsfrogsfrogs> X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org. See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html On Sun, Oct 04, 2026 at 10:55:33PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > From: Darrick J. Wong > > LOLLM observed that we should not allow repairs to proceed if the count > of delayed-allocation realtime extents exceeds the number of free rt > extents because we can't install negative numbers into the superblock. > It's unclear how we could end up in that state in real life, but let's > at least complain loudly about it if we ever encounter it. Looks good: Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig