From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=198.137.202.133 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1793275322; b=JClQ1+RizHP4Ka0tEO0ayePhFTOZfhxsHRjaAav2f3YEaVaQKZ0UHlbzY6frjy8v5P+T Y3yRLumYDx+a8PrVjse9fUsoAQWTKQKZ6NRsD+CiHNjN8oJbokWFzyTI9H6qtqHQuwikA QrdMPO6V7AKZxPXTs0RLM+oZUNXsy8KmTfO9uY61XcChDr+enlqI4NdBtKu/ZGwlqkVyl vpZey64UtRsrVbWlLn2HMeq4wMRmYQvLz1frEwWIztaj5zPvjGgwTOc6uOzmINx576IlK Bb4NfekvimGAwzr9AuYqSFewAqJHG2okEAJHZjszo2qaF7+TKJiHyrSVZUO6lPJPLkw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1793275322; h=DMARC-Filter:DKIM-Signature:Received:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject: Message-ID:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition: In-Reply-To:X-SRS-Rewrite; bh=tOmRIEYxWkgPEf8B0slT4zscUlC7y7/EPeg9N719zX8=; b=onqTjI+bkZEhmOGq0v8fhPBEATUs66E+GH54UsIJGez6PsdHa3cArVOEEDUGD3oouVDA j6Z+q3slre1X+BHR01+HYkREY9KxVbBNv+WFtEWBQjwMgT3bn0bl1/bfiZwdd5wM1yEs1 b4b2zcayS1i5CgKa5U66EtQQnZ3FXQyIFEzC6+SH2cBfv9xhwksBY0DrCuS+A5PinsgHF 0YmZsHZvSzyiEdnytMK9MluFkgHzoqvCht5wpg3CmK3KE6JH9PKw9OgDC1rKwG6UEOGbD h9Gqx0le9B179ZVHYBG0d4hefCzMJRYwS0VGsP+1S+algrxQdA/zxj5n6TSZQj8dbDw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass header.from=infradead.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=bombadil.srs.infradead.org; dkim=pass header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=bombadil.20210309 header.b=iJ25NTRS; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=198.137.202.133 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A89AC606A31C for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2026 12:02:01 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 smtp.subspace.kernel.org A89AC606A31C Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=bombadil.srs.infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=bombadil.20210309 header.b=iJ25NTRS DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version :References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=tOmRIEYxWkgPEf8B0slT4zscUlC7y7/EPeg9N719zX8=; b=iJ25NTRSZwWXzpGte/82R4dq37 KvUo1Cdev7hLxDoYp0jKRix2nJyE4GEfvOGQyTojDCrHTmSox57Yua6E2gFB/VjEOYDyne9eJZV0J sUB64nGPoEYtyZhW/GC3gcnjc7H24xd2H2uNoGA7J9kHVGALwzx74ujvy7rZof+Qy6iYHy5iZp04Y Baqyb6TtLRj3yAe/C04FB/4qG6COrcK7qvIYBjvXEjAidpGGrMlPjNXLhcQauvWPfU542Ijss2kNL TfuaMuFSzpDzVFMAXB0WWkI10NVECNMo2F3MWK4f/xkY8xkVpepLrI0wh08Wvj7+gOn5FUO68Yn10 P4/aVimw==; Received: from hch by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.100.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1xMOpV-000000096iB-0InA; Thu, 29 Oct 2026 12:02:01 +0000 Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2026 05:02:01 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Eric Sandeen Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, cem@kernel.org, hch@lst.de, dgc@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] xfs: remove status parameter from several btree insert functions Message-ID: References: <20261016193422.1630907-1-sandeen@redhat.com> <20261016193422.1630907-6-sandeen@redhat.com> X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org. See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html On Wed, Oct 28, 2026 at 05:35:29PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > > Although I agree with Darrick that spelling out the parameters would > > be helpful. > > > > thanks, agree but I dunno, seems like a dedicated patch to change /so many/ > of them would be good instead of hitting this one just because ... Yes, a separate patch sounds fine.