From: Dave Chinner <dgc@kernel.org>
To: Guikun Yang <yangguikun19@qq.com>
Cc: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: check the region index against ri_total in buffer
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2026 08:41:47 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <avI-G1JsBZZjz7ze@dread> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <tencent_ADBE1F465A9C5A4CFBA28A7D6AA39C527509@qq.com>
On Tue, Nov 10, 2026 at 02:00:00PM +0800, Guikun Yang wrote:
> Both xlog_recover_do_reg_buffer() and xlog_recover_do_inode_buffer()
> walk the buffer data map run by run and index item->ri_buf[] with a
> counter that is advanced once per run. The number of runs in the
> on-disk bitmap has no relationship to the number of regions the log
> item actually carries (ri_total, from blf_size), and the only bound
> on the index is an ASSERT - either the mid-loop ASSERT on ri_buf[i]
> or the trailing ASSERT(i == item->ri_total) - both of which compile
> away on production kernels.
>
> A crafted buffer log item with a data map that contains more runs
> than blf_size claims regions walks the index past the end of ri_buf[]
> and reads ri_buf[i].iov_base out of bounds. The destination side of
> do_reg_buffer() is already validated for real since the CVE-2026-80536
> fix ("... the only thing bounding the copy is an ASSERT(), which
> compiles away on production kernels"); the source index was left to
> the ASSERTs in both functions.
>
> Validate the index before each ri_buf[] use, in both functions:
>
> xlog_recover_do_reg_buffer(): i >= item->ri_total at the top of the
> loop body, reported as a bad buffer log item.
>
> xlog_recover_do_inode_buffer(): item_index >= item->ri_total right
> after the run-advance loop.
>
> Tested with two crafted dirty-log images (mount(2) alone): one hits
> do_reg_buffer (16 runs, blf_size 2), one hits do_inode_buffer
> (alternating map, blf_size 2). Both previously produced
> KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds; with this patch both fail recovery with
> the new message, and the unmodified images still mount.
>
> Reported-by: Guikun Yang <yangguikun19@qq.com> (bug reports of 2026-11-09, <c40-xfs-inodebuf-item-index-20261109@qq.com> and <c41-xfs-regbuf-run-index-20261109@qq.com>)
> Signed-off-by: Guikun Yang <yangguikun19@qq.com>
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item_recover.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
NACK. Not the way to fix these problems.
--
Dave Chinner
dgc@kernel.org
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-09 21:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-10 6:00 [PATCH] xfs: check the region index against ri_total in buffer Guikun Yang
2026-11-09 17:09 ` Carlos Maiolino
2026-11-10 15:30 ` [PATCH v2] xfs: check the region index against ri_total in buffer log item recovery Guikun Yang
2026-11-09 21:41 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=avI-G1JsBZZjz7ze@dread \
--to=dgc@kernel.org \
--cc=cem@kernel.org \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yangguikun19@qq.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox