public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>
Cc: Hans Holmberg <hans.holmberg@wdc.com>, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] xfs: handle too many open zones when mounting
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2026 18:30:49 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b3356808-d483-4efb-8eba-d7f57b24c965@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260330054111.3855818-3-hch@lst.de>

On 3/30/26 14:40, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> When running on conventional zones or devices, the zoned allocator does
> not have a real write pointer, but instead fakes it up at mount time
> based on the last block recorded in the rmap.  This can create spurious
> "open" zones when the last written blocks in a conventional zone are
> invalidated.  Add a loop to the mount code to find the conventional zones
> with the most used space and "finish" them.
> 
> While we're at it, also error out if there are too many open sequential
> zones, which can only happen when the user overrode the max open zones
> limit (or with really buggy hardware reducing the limit, but not much
> we can do about that).
> 
> Fixes: 4e4d52075577 ("xfs: add the zoned space allocator")
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

> +/*
> + * Find the fullest conventional zones and remove them from the open zone pool
> + * until we are at the open zone limit.
> + *
> + * We can end up with spurious "open" zones when the last blocks in a fully
> + * written zone were invalidate as there is no write pointer for conventional
> + * zone.

s/zone./zones.

> + *
> + * If we are still over the limit when there is no conventional open zone left,
> + * the user manually overrode the max open zones limit and we should fail.
> + */

"manually overrode the max open zones limit" sound a little odd and not clear,
since the maximum open zone limit is a read-only hardware limit. What can lead
to this is that someone wrote directly to the drive to some empty zones with the
FS unmounted, no ? (same comment for the commit message)

Other that the above 2 nits, this looks OK to me.


-- 
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-03-31  9:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-30  5:40 fix handling of too many open zones at mount time Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-30  5:40 ` [PATCH 1/4] xfs: refactor xfs_mount_zones Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-31  7:12   ` Hans Holmberg
2026-03-31  9:21   ` Damien Le Moal
2026-03-30  5:40 ` [PATCH 2/4] xfs: handle too many open zones when mounting Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-31  7:34   ` Hans Holmberg
2026-03-31  9:30   ` Damien Le Moal [this message]
2026-03-30  5:40 ` [PATCH 3/4] xfs: expose the number of open zones in sysfs Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-31  7:39   ` Hans Holmberg
2026-03-31  9:35   ` Damien Le Moal
2026-03-30  5:41 ` [PATCH 4/4] xfs: untangle the open zones reporting in mountinfo Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-30  5:47   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-30  9:55     ` Niklas Cassel
2026-03-30 13:10       ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-30 13:23     ` Carlos Maiolino
2026-03-31  7:41   ` Hans Holmberg
2026-03-31  9:36   ` Damien Le Moal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b3356808-d483-4efb-8eba-d7f57b24c965@kernel.org \
    --to=dlemoal@kernel.org \
    --cc=cem@kernel.org \
    --cc=hans.holmberg@wdc.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox