From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.fsfe.org ([217.69.89.162]:45560 "EHLO mail.fsfe.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752463AbeADQbF (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Jan 2018 11:31:05 -0500 Subject: Re: [patch V5 02/11] LICENSES: Add the GPL 2.0 license References: <20171228152710.891701433@linutronix.de> <20171228153308.366509938@linutronix.de> From: Carmen Bianca Bakker Message-ID: Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2018 17:25:38 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20171228153308.366509938@linutronix.de> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gUomQIhSsYl54SRq5xlMRhoEagYwCPrRC" Sender: linux-xfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: List-Id: xfs To: Thomas Gleixner , LKML Cc: Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Jonathan Corbet , Kate Stewart , Philippe Ombredanne , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Christoph Hellwig , Russell King , Rob Herring , Jonas Oberg , Joe Perches , linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Charlemagne Lasse , "Darrick J. Wong" , Heiko Carstens This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --gUomQIhSsYl54SRq5xlMRhoEagYwCPrRC Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="HKI7b2tBig5eeSknsN2OzW7175LYzYiMv"; protected-headers="v1" From: Carmen Bianca Bakker To: Thomas Gleixner , LKML Cc: Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Jonathan Corbet , Kate Stewart , Philippe Ombredanne , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Christoph Hellwig , Russell King , Rob Herring , Jonas Oberg , Joe Perches , linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Charlemagne Lasse , "Darrick J. Wong" , Heiko Carstens Message-ID: Subject: Re: [patch V5 02/11] LICENSES: Add the GPL 2.0 license References: <20171228152710.891701433@linutronix.de> <20171228153308.366509938@linutronix.de> In-Reply-To: <20171228153308.366509938@linutronix.de> --HKI7b2tBig5eeSknsN2OzW7175LYzYiMv Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all, Since December, `GPL-2.0` is no longer the correct identifier for the licence. The American FSF has been in talks with the SPDX Workgroup to change it to `GPL-2.0-only`. See the rationale here: https://www.gnu.org/licenses/identify-licenses-clearly.html See the new canonical licence list here: https://spdx.org/licenses/ This change is valid for all GPL licences. Similarly, `GPL-2.0+` has been changed to `GPL-2.0-or-later`. I believe that this patch should be changed to reflect that. The identifiers used in this patch are still valid, but deprecated. Yours sincerely, --=20 Carmen Bianca Bakker Technical Intern Free Software Foundation Europe e.V. --HKI7b2tBig5eeSknsN2OzW7175LYzYiMv-- --gUomQIhSsYl54SRq5xlMRhoEagYwCPrRC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEaOz9p2Grh2PLV5z6duum9rbqLskFAlpOVYMACgkQduum9rbq LsnfhxAAl6RDRwn3DZgJav2RG7COcj6E9fdCJHSzU4mXmicLq0vqOq1MmHSxeaqI C/VBYDHE0uIP2S1O728Rz+sBGLORTUjUQHBth/AB35GMfIJLyDpMLJzDdBXw77sJ dK0aFYv5xjkRfNimISVSMxeA8ZjjsbXFvrE4eRnBqw9v/vJPU0k82ukdMSuDgT3l PZL26FjQMToQqF53Etm6zisyDcOuflGovryQdyFJjY7s10bfH8Zc/II8mkIy9caa sVjrTYIo0zAOBwx/SEeoSQNtFStEn2eFy3VgG7u7n23DJuHsHpRSh6xzOn2LnnfL 3HphGy9pMGE6lZ2mzUqs73XDeBNNDcISYgvlIHobsG3m66ucGMyd5eFDVJhYdP3I Pej5ZxjrevBlVWa0R7Fr3tNng6+8iChmpdOBKEv90B4ZJCrWv4qUgcvzuSsKiuBn RA+0yIvRwa5PNAW0+IOUyv7oz1MSUpp5SzDdJq2196WggxyngmCpN9PHStRmrgSk Qgo6IEqTvCUDgIT4mrwjWMup1moB8Jkr2p+CqLtEjB2m33CKPeXVi3kEANAezzRm vvyiL6bfysUb1TSXxAsSV7bXG2R1hd8UyVdWsJnBDmRZonqYujDoctK0KNn2jLSi dUU4vVB8mK25TehPmZJO15WTmwSitP7tIU6rucJFfhcHxP/bd2g= =SIe4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --gUomQIhSsYl54SRq5xlMRhoEagYwCPrRC--