From: Tony Battersby <tonyb@cybernetics.com>
To: yukuai@kernel.org, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] md/raid0,raid4,raid5,raid6,raid10: fix bogus io_opt value
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2025 17:49:07 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b6af511e-9128-4775-8994-9bbaef3465a2@cybernetics.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3660751f-e230-498c-b857-99d61fe442e6@kernel.org>
On 7/29/25 12:56, Yu Kuai wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 在 2025/7/30 0:12, Tony Battersby 写道:
>> md-raid currently sets io_min and io_opt to the RAID chunk and stripe
>> sizes and then calls queue_limits_stack_bdev() to combine the io_min and
>> io_opt values with those of the component devices. The io_opt size is
>> notably combined using the least common multiple (lcm), which does not
>> work well in practice for some drives (1), resulting in overflow or
>> unreasonable values.
>>
>> dm-raid, on the other hand, sets io_min and io_opt through the
>> raid_io_hints() function, which is called after stacking all the queue
>> limits of the component drives, so the RAID chunk and stripe sizes
>> override the values of the stacking.
>>
>> Change md-raid to be more like dm-raid by setting io_min and io_opt to
>> the RAID chunk and stripe sizes after stacking the queue limits of the
>> component devies. This fixes /sys/block/md0/queue/optimal_io_size from
>> being a bogus value like 3221127168 to being the correct RAID stripe
>> size.
> This is already discussed, and mtp3sas should fix this strange value.
Thanks, I will follow that ongoing discussion.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/ywsfp3lqnijgig6yrlv2ztxram6ohf5z4yfeebswjkvp2dzisd@f5ikoyo3sfq5/
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-29 21:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-29 16:12 [PATCH 1/2] md/raid0,raid4,raid5,raid6,raid10: fix bogus io_opt value Tony Battersby
2025-07-29 16:56 ` Yu Kuai
2025-07-29 21:49 ` Tony Battersby [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b6af511e-9128-4775-8994-9bbaef3465a2@cybernetics.com \
--to=tonyb@cybernetics.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
--cc=yukuai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox