From: Lukas Herbolt <lukas@herbolt.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2] xfs: Print XFS UUID on mount and umount events.
Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 19:13:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bd3dd62e0926cc2aa7ba6070a88e67ac@herbolt.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210521160619.GF2207430@magnolia>
On 21.05.2021 18:06, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 11:03:11AM +0200, lukas@herbolt.com wrote:
>> > Are you going to wire up fs uuid logging for the other filesystems that
>> > support them?
>> Well, I wasn't planning to but I can take a look on other FS as well
>> Ext4 and Btrfs for start.
>>
>> > What happens w.r.t. uuid disambiguation if someone uses a nouuid mount
>> > to mount a filesystem with the same uuid as an already-mounted xfs?
>>
>> I a not sure I understand the "nouuid mount". I don't think there can
>> be XFS with empty uuid value in SB. And printing the message is
>> independent
>> on the mount method (mount UUID="" ...; mount /dev/sdX ...;).
>
> I meant specifically:
>
> mount /dev/mapper/fubar /mnt
> <snapshot fubar to fubar.bak>
>
> Oh no, I deleted something in fubar, let's retrieve it from fubar.bak!
>
> mount /dev/mapper/fubar.bak /opt # fails because same uuid as fubar
> mount /dev/mapper/fubar.bak /opt -o nouuid
>
> --D
>
Ah, right. Well using -o nouuid might have it's own info/notice in the
logs
to make it clear.
>>
>>
>> On 20.05.2021 17:23, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
>> > On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 05:22:48PM +0200, Lukas Herbolt wrote:
>> > > As of now only device names are printed out over __xfs_printk().
>> > > The device names are not persistent across reboots which in case
>> > > of searching for origin of corruption brings another task to properly
>> > > identify the devices. This patch add XFS UUID upon every mount/umount
>> > > event which will make the identification much easier.
>> >
>> > A few questions....
>> >
>> > Are you going to wire up fs uuid logging for the other filesystems that
>> > support them?
>> >
>> > What happens w.r.t. uuid disambiguation if someone uses a nouuid mount
>> > to mount a filesystem with the same uuid as an already-mounted xfs?
>> >
>> > The changes themselves look ok, but I'm wondering what the use case is
>> > here.
>> >
>> > --D
>> >
>> > >
>> > > Signed-off-by: Lukas Herbolt <lukas@herbolt.com>
>> > > ---
>> > > V2: Drop void casts and fix long lines
>> > >
>> > > fs/xfs/xfs_log.c | 10 ++++++----
>> > > fs/xfs/xfs_super.c | 2 +-
>> > > 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>> > >
>> > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_log.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_log.c
>> > > index 06041834daa31..8f4f671fd80d5 100644
>> > > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_log.c
>> > > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_log.c
>> > > @@ -570,12 +570,14 @@ xfs_log_mount(
>> > > int min_logfsbs;
>> > >
>> > > if (!(mp->m_flags & XFS_MOUNT_NORECOVERY)) {
>> > > - xfs_notice(mp, "Mounting V%d Filesystem",
>> > > - XFS_SB_VERSION_NUM(&mp->m_sb));
>> > > + xfs_notice(mp, "Mounting V%d Filesystem %pU",
>> > > + XFS_SB_VERSION_NUM(&mp->m_sb),
>> > > + &mp->m_sb.sb_uuid);
>> > > } else {
>> > > xfs_notice(mp,
>> > > -"Mounting V%d filesystem in no-recovery mode. Filesystem will be
>> > > inconsistent.",
>> > > - XFS_SB_VERSION_NUM(&mp->m_sb));
>> > > +"Mounting V%d filesystem %pU in no-recovery mode. Filesystem will
>> > > be inconsistent.",
>> > > + XFS_SB_VERSION_NUM(&mp->m_sb),
>> > > + &mp->m_sb.sb_uuid);
>> > > ASSERT(mp->m_flags & XFS_MOUNT_RDONLY);
>> > > }
>> > >
>> > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
>> > > index e5e0713bebcd8..a4b8a5ad8039f 100644
>> > > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
>> > > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
>> > > @@ -1043,7 +1043,7 @@ xfs_fs_put_super(
>> > > if (!sb->s_fs_info)
>> > > return;
>> > >
>> > > - xfs_notice(mp, "Unmounting Filesystem");
>> > > + xfs_notice(mp, "Unmounting Filesystem %pU", &mp->m_sb.sb_uuid);
>> > > xfs_filestream_unmount(mp);
>> > > xfs_unmountfs(mp);
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > 2.31.1
>> > >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-21 17:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-19 15:22 [PATCH RFC v2] xfs: Print XFS UUID on mount and umount events Lukas Herbolt
2021-05-20 15:23 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-05-21 9:03 ` lukas
2021-05-21 16:06 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-05-21 16:11 ` Eric Sandeen
2021-05-21 17:13 ` Lukas Herbolt [this message]
2022-06-03 16:14 ` Eric Sandeen
2022-06-04 0:34 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-06-06 14:05 ` Eric Sandeen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bd3dd62e0926cc2aa7ba6070a88e67ac@herbolt.com \
--to=lukas@herbolt.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox