From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org ([198.145.29.98]:47482 "EHLO mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729783AbeKLXYp (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Nov 2018 18:24:45 -0500 Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DDB229E61 for ; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 13:31:27 +0000 (UTC) From: bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org Subject: [Bug 200063] XFS corruption: mismatch between format (2) and size (0) in symlink Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 13:31:26 +0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-xfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: List-Id: xfs To: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200063 --- Comment #4 from Zorro Lang (zlang@redhat.com) --- I still can reproduce this bug on linux v4.20-rc1. So we haven't merged this patch (in comment 3), right? Phase 1 - find and verify superblock... - reporting progress in intervals of 15 minutes Phase 2 - using internal log - zero log... - scan filesystem freespace and inode maps... - 14:10:29: scanning filesystem freespace - 16 of 16 allocation groups done - found root inode chunk Phase 3 - for each AG... - scan (but don't clear) agi unlinked lists... - 14:10:29: scanning agi unlinked lists - 16 of 16 allocation groups done - process known inodes and perform inode discovery... - agno = 15 - agno = 0 - agno = 1 mismatch between format (2) and size (0) in symlink ino 125888517 bad data fork in symlink 125888517 would have cleared inode 125888517 - agno = 2 - agno = 3 - agno = 4 - agno = 5 - agno = 6 - agno = 7 - agno = 8 - agno = 9 - agno = 10 - agno = 11 - agno = 12 - agno = 13 - agno = 14 - 14:10:32: process known inodes and inode discovery - 50048 of 50048 inodes done - process newly discovered inodes... - 14:10:32: process newly discovered inodes - 16 of 16 allocation groups done Phase 4 - check for duplicate blocks... - setting up duplicate extent list... - 14:10:32: setting up duplicate extent list - 16 of 16 allocation groups done - check for inodes claiming duplicate blocks... - agno = 0 - agno = 13 - agno = 2 - agno = 3 - agno = 5 - agno = 4 - agno = 6 - agno = 7 - agno = 9 - agno = 11 - agno = 10 - agno = 8 - agno = 14 - agno = 12 - agno = 15 - agno = 1 mismatch between format (2) and size (0) in symlink ino 125888517 bad data fork in symlink 125888517 would have cleared inode 125888517 - 14:10:32: check for inodes claiming duplicate blocks - 50048 of 50048 inodes done No modify flag set, skipping phase 5 Phase 6 - check inode connectivity... - traversing filesystem ... - traversal finished ... - moving disconnected inodes to lost+found ... Phase 7 - verify link counts... - 14:10:33: verify and correct link counts - 16 of 16 allocation groups done -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug.