From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13E1FC5ACD6 for ; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 03:39:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E087B20724 for ; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 03:39:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726797AbgCRDjQ convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Mar 2020 23:39:16 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:33930 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726478AbgCRDjQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Mar 2020 23:39:16 -0400 From: bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org To: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: [Bug 206869] [xfstests generic/587]: quota mismatch Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2020 03:39:15 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: AssignedTo filesystem_xfs@kernel-bugs.kernel.org X-Bugzilla-Product: File System X-Bugzilla-Component: XFS X-Bugzilla-Version: 2.5 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: zlang@redhat.com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: filesystem_xfs@kernel-bugs.kernel.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-xfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206869 --- Comment #3 from Zorro Lang (zlang@redhat.com) --- (In reply to Darrick J. Wong from comment #2) > Created attachment 287959 [details] > test patch for xfstests > > Does the attached patch to generic/587 fix the problem? Yes, generic/587 test passed after merge this patch. And this patch looks smarter than what I write, I'll ack it after you send it to fstests:) # ./check generic/587 FSTYP -- xfs (debug) PLATFORM -- Linux/x86_64 xxx-xxxx-xxx 5.6.0-rc5-xfs-whatamess+ #2 SMP Fri Mar 13 12:21:33 CST 2020 MKFS_OPTIONS -- -f -m crc=0 -b size=512 /dev/mapper/testvg-scratchdev MOUNT_OPTIONS -- -o context=system_u:object_r:root_t:s0 /dev/mapper/testvg-scratchdev /mnt/scratch generic/587 3s ... 3s Ran: generic/587 Passed all 1 tests -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug.