public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org
To: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Bug 209243] [regression] fsx IO_URING reading get BAD DATA
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 07:07:09 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-209243-201763-opaRuXiAHH@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-209243-201763@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=209243

Zorro Lang (zlang@redhat.com) changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |axboe@kernel.dk
            Summary|fsx IO_URING reading get    |[regression] fsx IO_URING
                   |BAD DATA                    |reading get BAD DATA

--- Comment #5 from Zorro Lang (zlang@redhat.com) ---
Finally, I find the first commit which can reproduce this failure:

commit c3cf992c25c7ff04bfc4dec5c916705a5332320e
Author: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Date:   Fri May 22 09:24:42 2020 -0600

    io_uring: support true async buffered reads, if file provides it

    If the file is flagged with FMODE_BUF_RASYNC, then we don't have to punt
    the buffered read to an io-wq worker. Instead we can rely on page
    unlocking callbacks to support retry based async IO. This is a lot more
    efficient than doing async thread offload.

    The retry is done similarly to how we handle poll based retry. From
    the unlock callback, we simply queue the retry to a task_work based
    handler.

    Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

So CC the author of this patch to get more review.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-09-14  7:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-12  5:46 [Bug 209243] New: fsx IO_URING reading get BAD DATA bugzilla-daemon
2020-09-12  5:50 ` [Bug 209243] " bugzilla-daemon
2020-09-13  7:59 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-09-13 15:00 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-09-13 18:05 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-09-14  7:07 ` bugzilla-daemon [this message]
2020-09-14 13:39 ` [Bug 209243] [regression] " bugzilla-daemon
2020-09-14 15:04 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-09-14 15:27 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-09-14 18:17 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-09-14 19:49 ` bugzilla-daemon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-209243-201763-opaRuXiAHH@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/ \
    --to=bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox