From: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>,
Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>,
Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>,
fstests@vger.kernel.org, Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: fix write failures in software-provided atomic writes
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2025 16:35:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c3cdd46f-7169-48c9-ae7a-9c315713e31f@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251030150138.GW4015566@frogsfrogsfrogs>
On 30/10/2025 15:01, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
>> As for that corruption, I am seeing the same behaviour as Ojaswin described.
>> The failure is in a read operation.
>>
>> It seems to be a special combo of atomic write, write, and then read which
>> reliably shows the issue. The regular write seems to write to the cow fork,
>> so I am guessing that the atomic write does not leave it in proper state.
>>
>> I do notice for the atomic write that we are writing (calling
>> xfs_atomic_write_cow_iomap_begin() -> xfs_bmapi_write()) for more blocks
>> that are required for the atomic write. The regular write overwrites these
>> blocks, and the read is corrupted in the blocks just after the atomic write.
>> It's as if the blocks just after atomic write are not left in the proper
>> state.
> That's a good breadcrumb for me to follow;
I hope that it is ...
> I will turn on the rmap
> tracepoints to see if they give me a better idea of what's going on.
> I mentioned earlier that I think the problem could be that iomap treats
> srcmap::type == IOMAP_HOLE as if the srcmap isn't there, and so it'll
> read from the cow fork blocks even though that's not right.
Something else I notice for my failing test is that we do the regular
write, it ends in a sub-fs block write on a hole. But that fs block
(which was part of a hole) ends up being filled with all the same data
pattern (when I would expect the unwritten region to be 0s when read
back) - and this is what the compare fails on.
cheers
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-30 16:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-19 6:47 [PATCH v7 00/11] Add more tests for multi fs block atomic writes Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-09-19 6:47 ` [PATCH v7 01/12] common/rc: Add _min() and _max() helpers Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-09-19 6:47 ` [PATCH v7 02/12] common/rc: Add fio atomic write helpers Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-09-19 16:27 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-09-19 6:47 ` [PATCH v7 03/12] common/rc: Add a helper to run fsx on a given file Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-09-19 6:47 ` [PATCH v7 04/12] ltp/fsx.c: Add atomic writes support to fsx Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-09-28 8:55 ` Zorro Lang
2025-09-28 13:19 ` Zorro Lang
2025-10-02 17:56 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-10-03 17:19 ` Zorro Lang
2025-10-05 12:57 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-10-05 15:39 ` Zorro Lang
2025-10-06 13:20 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-10-07 9:58 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-10-17 16:01 ` Zorro Lang
2025-10-17 16:27 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-17 18:47 ` Zorro Lang
2025-10-17 22:52 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-20 10:33 ` John Garry
2025-10-21 10:28 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-10-21 11:30 ` Brian Foster
2025-10-21 11:58 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-10-21 17:44 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-22 7:40 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-10-23 15:44 ` John Garry
2025-10-23 17:55 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-29 18:11 ` [PATCH] xfs: fix write failures in software-provided atomic writes Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-29 18:13 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-30 13:52 ` John Garry
2025-10-30 15:01 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-30 16:35 ` John Garry [this message]
2025-10-30 19:38 ` John Garry
2025-10-31 4:30 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-31 10:17 ` John Garry
2025-10-31 17:13 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-11-03 12:16 ` John Garry
2025-11-03 18:01 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-31 8:08 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-10-31 10:04 ` John Garry
2025-09-19 6:47 ` [PATCH v7 05/12] generic: Add atomic write test using fio crc check verifier Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-10-28 9:42 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-11-01 9:00 ` Zorro Lang
2025-09-19 6:47 ` [PATCH v7 06/12] generic: Add atomic write test using fio verify on file mixed mappings Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-09-19 6:48 ` [PATCH v7 07/12] generic: Add atomic write multi-fsblock O_[D]SYNC tests Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-09-19 6:48 ` [PATCH v7 08/12] generic: Stress fsx with atomic writes enabled Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-09-19 6:48 ` [PATCH v7 09/12] generic: Add sudden shutdown tests for multi block atomic writes Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-09-19 6:48 ` [PATCH v7 10/12] ext4: Test atomic write and ioend codepaths with bigalloc Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-09-19 6:48 ` [PATCH v7 11/12] ext4: Test atomic writes allocation and write " Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-09-19 6:48 ` [PATCH v7 12/12] ext4: Atomic write test for extent split across leaf nodes Ojaswin Mujoo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c3cdd46f-7169-48c9-ae7a-9c315713e31f@oracle.com \
--to=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=cem@kernel.org \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=zlang@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).