linux-xfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>,
	Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>,
	Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>,
	fstests@vger.kernel.org, Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: fix write failures in software-provided atomic writes
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2025 16:35:06 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c3cdd46f-7169-48c9-ae7a-9c315713e31f@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251030150138.GW4015566@frogsfrogsfrogs>

On 30/10/2025 15:01, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
>> As for that corruption, I am seeing the same behaviour as Ojaswin described.
>> The failure is in a read operation.
>>
>> It seems to be a special combo of atomic write, write, and then read which
>> reliably shows the issue. The regular write seems to write to the cow fork,
>> so I am guessing that the atomic write does not leave it in proper state.
>>
>> I do notice for the atomic write that we are writing (calling
>> xfs_atomic_write_cow_iomap_begin() -> xfs_bmapi_write()) for more blocks
>> that are required for the atomic write. The regular write overwrites these
>> blocks, and the read is corrupted in the blocks just after the atomic write.
>> It's as if the blocks just after atomic write are not left in the proper
>> state.
> That's a good breadcrumb for me to follow;

I hope that it is ...

> I will turn on the rmap
> tracepoints to see if they give me a better idea of what's going on.
> I mentioned earlier that I think the problem could be that iomap treats
> srcmap::type == IOMAP_HOLE as if the srcmap isn't there, and so it'll
> read from the cow fork blocks even though that's not right.

Something else I notice for my failing test is that we do the regular 
write, it ends in a sub-fs block write on a hole. But that fs block 
(which was part of a hole) ends up being filled with all the same data 
pattern (when I would expect the unwritten region to be 0s when read 
back) - and this is what the compare fails on.

cheers

  reply	other threads:[~2025-10-30 16:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-19  6:47 [PATCH v7 00/11] Add more tests for multi fs block atomic writes Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-09-19  6:47 ` [PATCH v7 01/12] common/rc: Add _min() and _max() helpers Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-09-19  6:47 ` [PATCH v7 02/12] common/rc: Add fio atomic write helpers Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-09-19 16:27   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-09-19  6:47 ` [PATCH v7 03/12] common/rc: Add a helper to run fsx on a given file Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-09-19  6:47 ` [PATCH v7 04/12] ltp/fsx.c: Add atomic writes support to fsx Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-09-28  8:55   ` Zorro Lang
2025-09-28 13:19   ` Zorro Lang
2025-10-02 17:56     ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-10-03 17:19       ` Zorro Lang
2025-10-05 12:57         ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-10-05 15:39           ` Zorro Lang
2025-10-06 13:20             ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-10-07  9:58               ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-10-17 16:01                 ` Zorro Lang
2025-10-17 16:27                   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-17 18:47                     ` Zorro Lang
2025-10-17 22:52                       ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-20 10:33               ` John Garry
2025-10-21 10:28                 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-10-21 11:30                   ` Brian Foster
2025-10-21 11:58                     ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-10-21 17:44                       ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-22  7:40                         ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-10-23 15:44                           ` John Garry
2025-10-23 17:55                             ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-29 18:11   ` [PATCH] xfs: fix write failures in software-provided atomic writes Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-29 18:13     ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-30 13:52     ` John Garry
2025-10-30 15:01       ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-30 16:35         ` John Garry [this message]
2025-10-30 19:38           ` John Garry
2025-10-31  4:30             ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-31 10:17               ` John Garry
2025-10-31 17:13                 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-11-03 12:16                   ` John Garry
2025-11-03 18:01                     ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-31  8:08             ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-10-31 10:04               ` John Garry
2025-09-19  6:47 ` [PATCH v7 05/12] generic: Add atomic write test using fio crc check verifier Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-10-28  9:42   ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-11-01  9:00     ` Zorro Lang
2025-09-19  6:47 ` [PATCH v7 06/12] generic: Add atomic write test using fio verify on file mixed mappings Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-09-19  6:48 ` [PATCH v7 07/12] generic: Add atomic write multi-fsblock O_[D]SYNC tests Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-09-19  6:48 ` [PATCH v7 08/12] generic: Stress fsx with atomic writes enabled Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-09-19  6:48 ` [PATCH v7 09/12] generic: Add sudden shutdown tests for multi block atomic writes Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-09-19  6:48 ` [PATCH v7 10/12] ext4: Test atomic write and ioend codepaths with bigalloc Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-09-19  6:48 ` [PATCH v7 11/12] ext4: Test atomic writes allocation and write " Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-09-19  6:48 ` [PATCH v7 12/12] ext4: Atomic write test for extent split across leaf nodes Ojaswin Mujoo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c3cdd46f-7169-48c9-ae7a-9c315713e31f@oracle.com \
    --to=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
    --cc=cem@kernel.org \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=zlang@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).