From: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: Catherine Hoang <catherine.hoang@oracle.com>,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, fstests@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] generic/765: fix a few issues
Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 18:57:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cb1bce71-854e-478b-82eb-8a65ccfaf979@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250515145441.GY25667@frogsfrogsfrogs>
On 15/05/2025 15:54, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 09:16:12AM +0100, John Garry wrote:
>> On 14/05/2025 16:38, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
>>>>> --- a/common/rc
>>>>> +++ b/common/rc
>>>>> @@ -2989,7 +2989,7 @@ _require_xfs_io_command()
>>>>> fi
>>>>> if [ "$param" == "-A" ]; then
>>>>> opts+=" -d"
>>>>> - pwrite_opts+="-D -V 1 -b 4k"
>>>>> + pwrite_opts+="-d -V 1 -b 4k"
>>>> according to the documentation for -b, 4096 is the default (so I don't think
>>>> that we need to set it explicitly). But is that flag even relevant to
>>>> pwritev2?
>>> The documentation is wrong -- on XFS the default is the fs blocksize.
>>> Everywhere else is 4k.
>>
>> Right, I see that in init_cvtnum()
>>
>> However, from checking write_buffer(), we seem to split writes on this
>> blocksize - that does not seem proper in this instance.
>>
>> Should we really be doing something like:
>>
>> xfs_io -d -C "pwrite -b $SIZE -V 1 -A -D 0 $SIZE" file
>
> In _require_xfs_io_command? That only writes the first 4k of a file, so
> matching buffer size is ok.
right, I missed that. The usage in _require_xfs_io_command looks ok.
>
> Are you asking if _require_xfs_io_command should seek out the filesystem
> block size, and use that for the buffer and write size arguments instead
> of hardcoding 4k? For atomic writes, maybe it should be doing this,
> since the fs blocksize could be 64k.
>
I was just a bit thrown by how we need to specify -b $size with -A to
actually write $size atomically.
Thanks,
John
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-15 17:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-14 0:29 [PATCH 0/6] atomic writes tests Catherine Hoang
2025-05-14 0:29 ` [PATCH 1/6] generic/765: fix a few issues Catherine Hoang
2025-05-14 12:47 ` John Garry
2025-05-14 15:38 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-05-14 23:42 ` Catherine Hoang
2025-05-15 1:47 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-05-15 8:16 ` John Garry
2025-05-15 14:54 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-05-15 17:57 ` John Garry [this message]
2025-05-15 21:50 ` Catherine Hoang
2025-05-16 6:59 ` John Garry
2025-05-17 3:17 ` Ritesh Harjani
2025-05-14 0:29 ` [PATCH 2/6] generic/765: adjust various things Catherine Hoang
2025-05-14 12:59 ` John Garry
2025-05-17 3:36 ` Ritesh Harjani
2025-05-14 0:29 ` [PATCH 3/6] generic/765: move common atomic write code to a library file Catherine Hoang
2025-05-14 13:00 ` John Garry
2025-05-17 3:49 ` Ritesh Harjani
2025-05-14 0:29 ` [PATCH 4/6] common/atomicwrites: adjust a few more things Catherine Hoang
2025-05-14 13:11 ` John Garry
2025-05-14 15:40 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-05-17 3:59 ` Ritesh Harjani
2025-05-14 0:29 ` [PATCH 5/6] common/atomicwrites: fix _require_scratch_write_atomic Catherine Hoang
2025-05-14 13:14 ` John Garry
2025-05-14 0:29 ` [PATCH 6/6] generic: various atomic write tests with scsi_debug Catherine Hoang
2025-05-14 13:41 ` John Garry
2025-05-14 16:01 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-05-14 16:30 ` John Garry
2025-05-14 23:49 ` Catherine Hoang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cb1bce71-854e-478b-82eb-8a65ccfaf979@oracle.com \
--to=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=catherine.hoang@oracle.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).