public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
To: "Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" <ritesh.list@gmail.com>,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: djwong@kernel.org, ojaswin@linux.ibm.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Documentation: iomap: Add missing flags description
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2025 10:36:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cfd156b3-e166-4f2c-9cb2-c3dfd29c7f5b@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3170ab367b5b350c60564886a72719ccf573d01c.1743691371.git.ritesh.list@gmail.com>

On 03/04/2025 19:22, Ritesh Harjani (IBM) wrote:

IMHO, This document seems to be updated a lot, to the point where I 
think that it has too much detail.

> Let's document the use of these flags in iomap design doc where other
> flags are defined too -
> 
> - IOMAP_F_BOUNDARY was added by XFS to prevent merging of ioends
>    across RTG boundaries.
> - IOMAP_F_ATOMIC_BIO was added for supporting atomic I/O operations
>    for filesystems to inform the iomap that it needs HW-offload based
>    mechanism for torn-write protection
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
> ---
>   Documentation/filesystems/iomap/design.rst | 10 ++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/iomap/design.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/iomap/design.rst
> index e29651a42eec..b916e85bc930 100644
> --- a/Documentation/filesystems/iomap/design.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/iomap/design.rst
> @@ -243,6 +243,11 @@ The fields are as follows:
>        regular file data.
>        This is only useful for FIEMAP.
>   
> +   * **IOMAP_F_BOUNDARY**: This indicates that I/O and I/O completions
> +     for this iomap must never be merged with the mapping before it.

This is just effectively the same comment as in the code - what's the 
use in this?

> +     Currently XFS uses this to prevent merging of ioends across RTG
> +     (realtime group) boundaries.
> +
>      * **IOMAP_F_PRIVATE**: Starting with this value, the upper bits can
>        be set by the filesystem for its own purposes.

Is this comment now out of date according to your change in 923936efeb74?

>   
> @@ -250,6 +255,11 @@ The fields are as follows:
>        block assigned to it yet and the file system will do that in the bio
>        submission handler, splitting the I/O as needed.
>   
> +   * **IOMAP_F_ATOMIC_BIO**: Indicates that write I/O must be submitted
> +     with the ``REQ_ATOMIC`` flag set in the bio.

This is effectively the same comment as iomap.h

> Filesystems need to set
> +     this flag to inform iomap that the write I/O operation requires
> +     torn-write protection based on HW-offload mechanism.

Personally I think that this is obvious. If not, the reader should check 
the xfs and ext4 example in the code.

> +
>      These flags can be set by iomap itself during file operations.
>      The filesystem should supply an ``->iomap_end`` function if it needs
>      to observe these flags:


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-04-04  9:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-03 18:22 [PATCH 1/2] Documentation: iomap: Add missing flags description Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2025-04-03 18:22 ` [PATCH 2/2] iomap: trace: Add missing flags to [IOMAP_|IOMAP_F_]FLAGS_STRINGS Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2025-04-07 18:48   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-04-04  9:36 ` John Garry [this message]
2025-04-04 10:23   ` [PATCH 1/2] Documentation: iomap: Add missing flags description Ritesh Harjani
2025-04-07  8:45     ` John Garry
2025-04-07 16:37       ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-04-07  8:50   ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-07 16:43     ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-04-07 16:17   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-04-07 16:25 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-04-07 18:30   ` Ritesh Harjani

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cfd156b3-e166-4f2c-9cb2-c3dfd29c7f5b@oracle.com \
    --to=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox