* [patch v1 0/2] Misc refactoring in XFS
@ 2026-02-06 15:37 Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2026-02-06 15:38 ` [patch v1 1/2] xfs: Refactoring the nagcount and delta calculation Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Nirjhar Roy (IBM) @ 2026-02-06 15:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: djwong, hch, cem; +Cc: linux-xfs, ritesh.list, ojaswin, nirjhar.roy.lists
This patchset contains 2 refactorings. Details are in the patches.
Please note that the RB for patch 1 was given in [1].
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250729202428.GE2672049@frogsfrogsfrogs/
Nirjhar Roy (IBM) (2):
xfs: Refactoring the nagcount and delta calculation
xfs: Use rtg_group() wrapper in xfs_zone_gc.c
fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ag.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ag.h | 3 +++
fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c | 17 ++---------------
fs/xfs/xfs_zone_gc.c | 4 ++--
4 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
--
2.43.5
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* [patch v1 1/2] xfs: Refactoring the nagcount and delta calculation 2026-02-06 15:37 [patch v1 0/2] Misc refactoring in XFS Nirjhar Roy (IBM) @ 2026-02-06 15:38 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM) 2026-02-10 9:01 ` [patch v1 0/2] Misc refactoring in XFS Carlos Maiolino 2026-02-10 12:35 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM) 2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Nirjhar Roy (IBM) @ 2026-02-06 15:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: djwong, hch, cem; +Cc: linux-xfs, ritesh.list, ojaswin, nirjhar.roy.lists Introduce xfs_growfs_compute_delta() to calculate the nagcount and delta blocks and refactor the code from xfs_growfs_data_private(). No functional changes. Reviewed-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Nirjhar Roy (IBM) <nirjhar.roy.lists@gmail.com> --- fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ag.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ag.h | 3 +++ fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c | 17 ++--------------- 3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ag.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ag.c index e6ba914f6d06..f2b35d59d51e 100644 --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ag.c +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ag.c @@ -872,6 +872,34 @@ xfs_ag_shrink_space( return err2; } +void +xfs_growfs_compute_deltas( + struct xfs_mount *mp, + xfs_rfsblock_t nb, + int64_t *deltap, + xfs_agnumber_t *nagcountp) +{ + xfs_rfsblock_t nb_div, nb_mod; + int64_t delta; + xfs_agnumber_t nagcount; + + nb_div = nb; + nb_mod = do_div(nb_div, mp->m_sb.sb_agblocks); + if (nb_mod && nb_mod >= XFS_MIN_AG_BLOCKS) + nb_div++; + else if (nb_mod) + nb = nb_div * mp->m_sb.sb_agblocks; + + if (nb_div > XFS_MAX_AGNUMBER + 1) { + nb_div = XFS_MAX_AGNUMBER + 1; + nb = nb_div * mp->m_sb.sb_agblocks; + } + nagcount = nb_div; + delta = nb - mp->m_sb.sb_dblocks; + *deltap = delta; + *nagcountp = nagcount; +} + /* * Extent the AG indicated by the @id by the length passed in */ diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ag.h b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ag.h index 1f24cfa27321..f7b56d486468 100644 --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ag.h +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ag.h @@ -331,6 +331,9 @@ struct aghdr_init_data { int xfs_ag_init_headers(struct xfs_mount *mp, struct aghdr_init_data *id); int xfs_ag_shrink_space(struct xfs_perag *pag, struct xfs_trans **tpp, xfs_extlen_t delta); +void +xfs_growfs_compute_deltas(struct xfs_mount *mp, xfs_rfsblock_t nb, + int64_t *deltap, xfs_agnumber_t *nagcountp); int xfs_ag_extend_space(struct xfs_perag *pag, struct xfs_trans *tp, xfs_extlen_t len); int xfs_ag_get_geometry(struct xfs_perag *pag, struct xfs_ag_geometry *ageo); diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c index 0ada73569394..8353e2f186f6 100644 --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c @@ -92,18 +92,17 @@ xfs_growfs_data_private( struct xfs_growfs_data *in) /* growfs data input struct */ { xfs_agnumber_t oagcount = mp->m_sb.sb_agcount; + xfs_rfsblock_t nb = in->newblocks; struct xfs_buf *bp; int error; xfs_agnumber_t nagcount; xfs_agnumber_t nagimax = 0; - xfs_rfsblock_t nb, nb_div, nb_mod; int64_t delta; bool lastag_extended = false; struct xfs_trans *tp; struct aghdr_init_data id = {}; struct xfs_perag *last_pag; - nb = in->newblocks; error = xfs_sb_validate_fsb_count(&mp->m_sb, nb); if (error) return error; @@ -122,20 +121,8 @@ xfs_growfs_data_private( mp->m_sb.sb_rextsize); if (error) return error; + xfs_growfs_compute_deltas(mp, nb, &delta, &nagcount); - nb_div = nb; - nb_mod = do_div(nb_div, mp->m_sb.sb_agblocks); - if (nb_mod && nb_mod >= XFS_MIN_AG_BLOCKS) - nb_div++; - else if (nb_mod) - nb = nb_div * mp->m_sb.sb_agblocks; - - if (nb_div > XFS_MAX_AGNUMBER + 1) { - nb_div = XFS_MAX_AGNUMBER + 1; - nb = nb_div * mp->m_sb.sb_agblocks; - } - nagcount = nb_div; - delta = nb - mp->m_sb.sb_dblocks; /* * Reject filesystems with a single AG because they are not * supported, and reject a shrink operation that would cause a -- 2.43.5 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch v1 0/2] Misc refactoring in XFS 2026-02-06 15:37 [patch v1 0/2] Misc refactoring in XFS Nirjhar Roy (IBM) 2026-02-06 15:38 ` [patch v1 1/2] xfs: Refactoring the nagcount and delta calculation Nirjhar Roy (IBM) @ 2026-02-10 9:01 ` Carlos Maiolino 2026-02-10 10:01 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM) 2026-02-10 12:35 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM) 2 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Carlos Maiolino @ 2026-02-10 9:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Nirjhar Roy (IBM); +Cc: djwong, hch, linux-xfs, ritesh.list, ojaswin On Fri, Feb 06, 2026 at 09:07:59PM +0530, Nirjhar Roy (IBM) wrote: > This patchset contains 2 refactorings. Details are in the patches. > Please note that the RB for patch 1 was given in [1]. > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250729202428.GE2672049@frogsfrogsfrogs/ > > Nirjhar Roy (IBM) (2): > xfs: Refactoring the nagcount and delta calculation > xfs: Use rtg_group() wrapper in xfs_zone_gc.c I can only see a single patch in this series, same in lore.kernel. I'm assuming you made some mistake when sending it. > > fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ag.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ag.h | 3 +++ > fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c | 17 ++--------------- > fs/xfs/xfs_zone_gc.c | 4 ++-- > 4 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.43.5 > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch v1 0/2] Misc refactoring in XFS 2026-02-10 9:01 ` [patch v1 0/2] Misc refactoring in XFS Carlos Maiolino @ 2026-02-10 10:01 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM) 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Nirjhar Roy (IBM) @ 2026-02-10 10:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Carlos Maiolino; +Cc: djwong, hch, linux-xfs, ritesh.list, ojaswin On 2/10/26 14:31, Carlos Maiolino wrote: > On Fri, Feb 06, 2026 at 09:07:59PM +0530, Nirjhar Roy (IBM) wrote: >> This patchset contains 2 refactorings. Details are in the patches. >> Please note that the RB for patch 1 was given in [1]. >> >> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250729202428.GE2672049@frogsfrogsfrogs/ >> >> Nirjhar Roy (IBM) (2): >> xfs: Refactoring the nagcount and delta calculation >> xfs: Use rtg_group() wrapper in xfs_zone_gc.c > I can only see a single patch in this series, same in lore.kernel. I'm > assuming you made some mistake when sending it. No, not a mistake really. After patch 0/2 and 1/2 was sent, gmail for some reason blocked patch 2/2 - since then I have tried multiple times to send it, but it is repeatedly getting blocked. I am still in the process of figuring this out. The 2 patches are independent, so if you want, you can look at patch 1/2 for now. I am checking as to why is the second patch getting blocked by gmail. Also, if you have any idea as to why some specific patch/patch-file can getting blocked, maybe can you please shed some light (I have verfied that I am able to send other patches/patch-files, only the patch 2/2 is getting blocked). --NR > >> fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ag.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ag.h | 3 +++ >> fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c | 17 ++--------------- >> fs/xfs/xfs_zone_gc.c | 4 ++-- >> 4 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) >> >> -- >> 2.43.5 >> -- Nirjhar Roy Linux Kernel Developer IBM, Bangalore ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch v1 0/2] Misc refactoring in XFS 2026-02-06 15:37 [patch v1 0/2] Misc refactoring in XFS Nirjhar Roy (IBM) 2026-02-06 15:38 ` [patch v1 1/2] xfs: Refactoring the nagcount and delta calculation Nirjhar Roy (IBM) 2026-02-10 9:01 ` [patch v1 0/2] Misc refactoring in XFS Carlos Maiolino @ 2026-02-10 12:35 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM) 2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Nirjhar Roy (IBM) @ 2026-02-10 12:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: djwong, hch, cem; +Cc: linux-xfs, ritesh.list, ojaswin On Fri, 2026-02-06 at 21:07 +0530, Nirjhar Roy (IBM) wrote: > This patchset contains 2 refactorings. Details are in the patches. > Please note that the RB for patch 1 was given in [1]. Please ignore this series - there was some technical glitch in gmail while I was trying to send it. I have re-sent in [2]. [2] - https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1770725429.git.nirjhar.roy.lists@gmail.com/ --NR > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250729202428.GE2672049@frogsfrogsfrogs/ > > Nirjhar Roy (IBM) (2): > xfs: Refactoring the nagcount and delta calculation > xfs: Use rtg_group() wrapper in xfs_zone_gc.c > > fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ag.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ag.h | 3 +++ > fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c | 17 ++--------------- > fs/xfs/xfs_zone_gc.c | 4 ++-- > 4 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-02-10 12:35 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2026-02-06 15:37 [patch v1 0/2] Misc refactoring in XFS Nirjhar Roy (IBM) 2026-02-06 15:38 ` [patch v1 1/2] xfs: Refactoring the nagcount and delta calculation Nirjhar Roy (IBM) 2026-02-10 9:01 ` [patch v1 0/2] Misc refactoring in XFS Carlos Maiolino 2026-02-10 10:01 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM) 2026-02-10 12:35 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox