From: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
To: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>, Chi Zhiling <chizhiling@163.com>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
djwong@kernel.org, cem@kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Chi Zhiling <chizhiling@kylinos.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: Remove i_rwsem lock in buffered read
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2025 12:15:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dca3db30-0e8f-4387-9d4d-974def306502@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOQ4uxjgGQmeid3-wa5VNy5EeOYNz+FmTAZVOtUsw+2F+x9fdQ@mail.gmail.com>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> index c488ae26b23d0..2542f15496488 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> @@ -777,9 +777,10 @@ xfs_file_buffered_write(
> ssize_t ret;
> bool cleared_space = false;
> unsigned int iolock;
> + bool atomic_write = iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_ATOMIC;
>
> write_retry:
> - iolock = XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL;
> + iolock = atomic_write ? XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED : XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL;
> ret = xfs_ilock_iocb(iocb, iolock);
> --
>
> xfs_file_write_checks() afterwards already takes care of promoting
> XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED to XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL for extending writes.
>
> It is possible that XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL could be immediately demoted
> back to XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED for atomic_writes as done in
> xfs_file_dio_write_aligned().
>
> TBH, I am not sure which blockdevs support 4K atomic writes that could
> be used to test this.
>
> John, can you share your test setup instructions for atomic writes?
Please note that IOCB_ATOMIC is not supported for buffered IO, so we
can't do this - we only support direct IO today.
And supporting buffered IO has its challenges; how to handle overlapping
atomic writes of differing sizes sitting in the page cache is the main
issue which comes to mind.
Thanks,
John
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-08 12:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-26 6:16 [PATCH] xfs: Remove i_rwsem lock in buffered read Chi Zhiling
2024-12-26 21:50 ` Dave Chinner
2024-12-28 7:37 ` Chi Zhiling
2024-12-28 22:17 ` Dave Chinner
2024-12-30 2:42 ` Chi Zhiling
2025-01-07 12:13 ` Amir Goldstein
2025-01-07 17:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-08 7:43 ` Chi Zhiling
2025-01-08 11:33 ` Amir Goldstein
2025-01-08 11:45 ` Amir Goldstein
2025-01-08 12:15 ` John Garry [this message]
2025-01-09 10:07 ` Amir Goldstein
2025-01-09 12:40 ` John Garry
2025-01-09 8:37 ` Chi Zhiling
2025-01-09 10:25 ` Amir Goldstein
2025-01-09 12:10 ` Chi Zhiling
2025-01-09 12:25 ` John Garry
2025-01-08 17:35 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-09 23:28 ` Dave Chinner
2025-01-10 1:31 ` Chi Zhiling
2025-01-10 17:07 ` Amir Goldstein
2025-01-12 10:05 ` Chi Zhiling
2025-01-13 2:44 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-13 5:59 ` Chi Zhiling
2025-01-13 13:40 ` Brian Foster
2025-01-13 16:19 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-15 5:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-15 21:41 ` Dave Chinner
2025-01-16 4:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-17 22:20 ` Dave Chinner
2025-01-16 14:23 ` Brian Foster
2025-01-17 13:27 ` Amir Goldstein
2025-01-17 22:19 ` Dave Chinner
2025-01-18 13:03 ` Amir Goldstein
2025-01-20 5:11 ` Dave Chinner
2025-01-22 6:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-22 23:35 ` Dave Chinner
2025-01-17 16:12 ` Chi Zhiling
2025-01-24 7:57 ` Chi Zhiling
2025-01-27 20:49 ` Dave Chinner
2025-01-28 5:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-28 21:23 ` David Laight
2025-01-29 0:59 ` Dave Chinner
2025-01-29 5:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-02-10 1:44 ` Chi Zhiling
2025-01-14 0:09 ` Dave Chinner
2025-01-25 8:43 ` Jinliang Zheng
2025-01-25 14:14 ` Amir Goldstein
2025-06-20 14:03 ` Jinliang Zheng
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-03-25 0:10 [QUESTION] Long read latencies on mixed rw buffered IO Dave Chinner
2025-06-20 13:46 ` [PATCH] xfs: Remove i_rwsem lock in buffered read Jinliang Zheng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=dca3db30-0e8f-4387-9d4d-974def306502@oracle.com \
--to=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=cem@kernel.org \
--cc=chizhiling@163.com \
--cc=chizhiling@kylinos.cn \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).