public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zizhi Wo <wozizhi@huawei.com>
To: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Cc: <oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev>, <lkp@intel.com>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Chandan Babu R <chandanbabu@kernel.org>,
	"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
	<linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [linus:master] [xfs] ca6448aed4: xfstests.xfs.556.fail
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2024 17:16:17 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <df1a565a-7de7-4b13-9137-0ec10f4dabc7@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202409031358.2c34ad37-oliver.sang@intel.com>

Hi

在 2024/9/3 13:18, kernel test robot 写道:
> 
> 
> Hello,
> 
> kernel test robot noticed "xfstests.xfs.556.fail" on:
> 
> commit: ca6448aed4f10ad88eba79055f181eb9a589a7b3 ("xfs: Fix missing interval for missing_owner in xfs fsmap")
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
> 
> [test failed on linus/master      431c1646e1f86b949fa3685efc50b660a364c2b6]
> [test failed on linux-next/master 985bf40edf4343dcb04c33f58b40b4a85c1776d4]
> 
> in testcase: xfstests
> version: xfstests-x86_64-d9423fec-1_20240826
> with following parameters:
> 
> 	disk: 4HDD
> 	fs: xfs
> 	test: xfs-556
> 
> 
> 
> compiler: gcc-12
> test machine: 4 threads Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1225 v5 @ 3.30GHz (Skylake) with 16G memory
> 
> (please refer to attached dmesg/kmsg for entire log/backtrace)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202409031358.2c34ad37-oliver.sang@intel.com
> 
> 2024-09-01 09:27:55 export TEST_DIR=/fs/sda1
> 2024-09-01 09:27:55 export TEST_DEV=/dev/sda1
> 2024-09-01 09:27:55 export FSTYP=xfs
> 2024-09-01 09:27:55 export SCRATCH_MNT=/fs/scratch
> 2024-09-01 09:27:55 mkdir /fs/scratch -p
> 2024-09-01 09:27:55 export SCRATCH_DEV=/dev/sda4
> 2024-09-01 09:27:55 export SCRATCH_LOGDEV=/dev/sda2
> 2024-09-01 09:27:55 export SCRATCH_XFS_LIST_METADATA_FIELDS=u3.sfdir3.hdr.parent.i4
> 2024-09-01 09:27:55 export SCRATCH_XFS_LIST_FUZZ_VERBS=random
> 2024-09-01 09:27:55 echo xfs/556
> 2024-09-01 09:27:55 ./check xfs/556
> FSTYP         -- xfs (debug)
> PLATFORM      -- Linux/x86_64 lkp-skl-d06 6.11.0-rc5-00007-gca6448aed4f1 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Sun Sep  1 16:52:26 CST 2024
> MKFS_OPTIONS  -- -f /dev/sda4
> MOUNT_OPTIONS -- /dev/sda4 /fs/scratch
> 
> xfs/556       - output mismatch (see /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/results//xfs/556.out.bad)
>      --- tests/xfs/556.out	2024-08-26 19:09:50.000000000 +0000
>      +++ /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/results//xfs/556.out.bad	2024-09-01 09:28:17.532120817 +0000
>      @@ -1,12 +1,21 @@
>       QA output created by 556
>       Scrub for injected media error (single threaded)
>      +Corruption: disk offset 106496: media error in unknown owner. (phase6.c line 400)
>       Unfixable Error: SCRATCH_MNT/a: media error at data offset 2FSB length 1FSB.
>       SCRATCH_MNT: unfixable errors found: 1
>      +SCRATCH_MNT: corruptions found: 1
>      +SCRATCH_MNT: Unmount and run xfs_repair.
>      ...
>      (Run 'diff -u /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/tests/xfs/556.out /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/results//xfs/556.out.bad'  to see the entire diff)
> Ran: xfs/556
> Failures: xfs/556
> Failed 1 of 1 tests
> 
> 
> 
> 
> The kernel config and materials to reproduce are available at:
> https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240903/202409031358.2c34ad37-oliver.sang@intel.com
> 
> 

I attempted to reproduce the issue using the script provided in this
link: 
https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240903/202409031358.2c34ad37-oliver.sang@intel.com/repro-script.
but I discovered that it might not be related to my patch. After I
reverted my own fsmap-related patches locally and ran the test case
using this script, it still failed.

I'm not sure if it's due to an issue with my own environment or if there
are other factors I haven't considered.

However, I still found the current problems of fsmap, and I am not sure
whether it is related to these two.[1][2]

[1] 
https://lore.kernel.org/all/550c038b-d931-4d00-9ebd-5c903e5ddf07@huawei.com/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240826031005.2493150-1-wozizhi@huawei.com/

Thanks,
Zizhi Wo

> 

  reply	other threads:[~2024-09-03  9:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-09-03  5:18 [linus:master] [xfs] ca6448aed4: xfstests.xfs.556.fail kernel test robot
2024-09-03  9:16 ` Zizhi Wo [this message]
2024-09-03  9:31   ` Zizhi Wo
2024-09-03  9:47 ` Chandan Babu R

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=df1a565a-7de7-4b13-9137-0ec10f4dabc7@huawei.com \
    --to=wozizhi@huawei.com \
    --cc=chandanbabu@kernel.org \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox