From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD62E7F90 for ; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 10:35:24 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA21130404E for ; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 08:35:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.zbfmail.de (mail.zbfmail.de [176.9.84.12]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id TTHKvWSDEcE7QOnQ (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 08:35:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.zbfmail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.zbfmail.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8AC92F5BF for ; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 16:35:14 +0100 (CET) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 16:35:14 +0100 From: Marko Weber|8000 Subject: elevator question Message-ID: Reply-To: weber@zbfmail.de List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Xfs hello list, in the xfs faq i read elevator=noop is best when using ssd. i have the gentoo system on a ssd, but the larger data storage partition on softraid with some sata disks. is elevator=noop in this combo still best? thx for any cunstructive answer marko -- zbfmail - Mittendrin statt nur Datei! OpenDKIM, SPF, DSPAM, Greylisting, POSTSCREEN, AMAVIS, Mailgateways Mailfiltering, SMTP Service, Spam Abwehr, MX-Backup, Mailserver Backup Redundante Mailgateways, HA Mailserver, Secure Mailserver _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs