From: Gionatan Danti <g.danti@assyoma.it>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, g.danti@assyoma.it
Subject: Re: Question about logbsize default value
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 09:10:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <eb0ef021-27be-c0bd-5950-103cd8b04594@assyoma.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191024215027.GC4614@dread.disaster.area>
On 24/10/19 23:50, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 11:40:33AM +0200, Gionatan Danti wrote:
> Defaults are for best compatibility and general behaviour, not
> best performance. A log stripe unit of 32kB allows the user to
> configure a logbsize appropriate for their workload, as it supports
> logbsize of 32kB, 64kB, 128kB and 256kB. If we chose 256kB as the
> default log stripe unit, then you have no opportunity to set the
> logbsize appropriately for your workload.
>
> remember, LSU determines how much padding is added to every non-full
> log write - 32kB pads out ot 32kB, 256kB pads out to 256kB. Hence if
> you have a workload that frequnetly writes non-full iclogs (e.g.
> regular fsyncs) then a small LSU results in much better performance
> as there is less padding that needs to be initialised and the IOs
> are much smaller.
>
> Hence for the general case (i.e. what the defaults are aimed at), a
> small LSU is a much better choice. you can still use a large
> logbsize mount option and it will perform identically to a large LSU
> filesystem on full iclog workloads (like the above fsmark workload
> that doesn't use fsync). However, a small LSU is likely to perform
> better over a wider range of workloads and storage than a large LSU,
> and so small LSU is a better choice for the default....
Hi Dave, thank you for your explanation. The observed behavior of a
large LSU surely matches what you described - less-than-optimal fsync perf.
That said, I was wondering why *logbsize* (rather than LSU) has a low
default of 32k (or, better, its default is to match LSU size). If I
understand it correctly, a large logbsize (eg: 256k) on top of a small
LSU (32k) would give high performance on both full-log-writes and
partial-log-writes (eg: frequent fsync).
Is my understanding correct? If you, do you suggest to always set
logbsize to the maximum supported value?
Thanks.
--
Danti Gionatan
Supporto Tecnico
Assyoma S.r.l. - www.assyoma.it
email: g.danti@assyoma.it - info@assyoma.it
GPG public key ID: FF5F32A8
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-25 7:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-23 9:40 Question about logbsize default value Gionatan Danti
2019-10-24 21:50 ` Dave Chinner
2019-10-25 7:10 ` Gionatan Danti [this message]
2019-10-25 23:39 ` Dave Chinner
2019-10-26 9:54 ` Gionatan Danti
2019-10-26 21:59 ` Dave Chinner
2019-10-27 18:09 ` Gionatan Danti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=eb0ef021-27be-c0bd-5950-103cd8b04594@assyoma.it \
--to=g.danti@assyoma.it \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox