linux-xfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yongpeng Yang <yangyongpeng.storage@gmail.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: Yongpeng Yang <yangyongpeng.storage@gmail.com>,
	Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>,
	Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>,
	OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>,
	Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	Yongpeng Yang <yangyongpeng@xiaomi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix missing sb_min_blocksize() return value checks in some filesystems
Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2025 22:53:57 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ef70adab-ed59-45c7-b6f0-93b61fdb620b@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aQTpLEHURCmkpU3K@casper.infradead.org>

On 11/1/2025 12:51 AM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2025 at 08:23:24AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
>> Hrmm... sb_min_blocksize clamps its argument (512) up to the bdev lba
>> size, which could fail.  That's unlikely given that XFS sets FS_LBS and
>> there shouldn't be a file->private_data; but this function is fallible
>> so let's not just ignore the return value.
> 
> Should sb_min_blocksize() be marked __must_check ?

Thanks for the review. I'll add the __must_check mark to 
sb_min_blocksize() and include the Fixes tag in v2.

Yongpeng,

      reply	other threads:[~2025-11-02 14:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-31 14:15 [PATCH] fix missing sb_min_blocksize() return value checks in some filesystems Yongpeng Yang
2025-10-31 15:23 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-31 16:51   ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-11-02 14:53     ` Yongpeng Yang [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ef70adab-ed59-45c7-b6f0-93b61fdb620b@gmail.com \
    --to=yangyongpeng.storage@gmail.com \
    --cc=cem@kernel.org \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linkinjeon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sj1557.seo@samsung.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=yangyongpeng@xiaomi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).