From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
To: linux-xfs <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 0/5] xfs: quota verifier/repair improvements take 2
Date: Fri, 4 May 2018 12:33:08 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f5d059e3-28de-e365-acd4-d82aa9d17db7@redhat.com> (raw)
A new attempt at the quota improvements regarding in-kernel repair
and verifier behavior.
This series structures things a bit differently to avoid the log
replay verifier failure Darrick hit :( and also uses his new
sub-buffer verifier error function to print the specific corrupted
quota.
Ran this one through -g quick,auto with "-o quota" and saw no
regressions.
For now I've left out the last 2 patches from last time which try to
quiet down the kernel messages when mounting/quotachecking a corrupted
fs, I want to think about those & let them soak a bit more.
Thanks,
-Eric
next reply other threads:[~2018-05-04 17:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-04 17:33 Eric Sandeen [this message]
2018-05-04 17:34 ` [PATCH 1/5] xfs: remove unused flags arg from xfs_dquot_verify Eric Sandeen
2018-05-04 17:34 ` [PATCH 2/5] xfs: check type in quota verifier during quotacheck Eric Sandeen
2018-05-04 22:08 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-05-07 15:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-04 17:34 ` [PATCH 3/5] xfs: repair full xfs_dqblk " Eric Sandeen
2018-05-04 22:09 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-05-07 15:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-07 15:22 ` [PATCH 3/5 V2] xfs: pass full xfs_dqblk to repair " Eric Sandeen
2018-05-07 16:15 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-05-04 17:35 ` [PATCH 4/5] xfs: add full xfs_dqblk verifier Eric Sandeen
2018-05-04 22:09 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-05-07 15:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-07 15:20 ` [PATCH 4/5 V2] " Eric Sandeen
2018-05-04 17:35 ` [PATCH 5/5] xfs: print specific dqblk that failed verifiers Eric Sandeen
2018-05-04 21:46 ` [PATCH 6/5] xfs: make several functions void Eric Sandeen
2018-05-04 22:29 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-05-04 22:36 ` Eric Sandeen
2018-05-04 22:10 ` [PATCH 5/5] xfs: print specific dqblk that failed verifiers Darrick J. Wong
2018-05-07 15:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f5d059e3-28de-e365-acd4-d82aa9d17db7@redhat.com \
--to=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox