From: "Nirjhar Roy (IBM)" <nirjhar.roy.lists@gmail.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, ritesh.list@gmail.com,
ojaswin@linux.ibm.com, zlang@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] check: Fix fs specfic imports when $FSTYPE!=$OLD_FSTYPE
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2025 16:48:10 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f89b6b40-8dce-4378-ba56-cf7f29695bdb@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250128180917.GA3561257@frogsfrogsfrogs>
On 1/28/25 23:39, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 05:00:22AM +0000, Nirjhar Roy (IBM) wrote:
>> Bug Description:
>>
>> _test_mount function is failing with the following error:
>> ./common/rc: line 4716: _xfs_prepare_for_eio_shutdown: command not found
>> check: failed to mount /dev/loop0 on /mnt1/test
>>
>> when the second section in local.config file is xfs and the first section
>> is non-xfs.
>>
>> It can be easily reproduced with the following local.config file
>>
>> [s2]
>> export FSTYP=ext4
>> export TEST_DEV=/dev/loop0
>> export TEST_DIR=/mnt1/test
>> export SCRATCH_DEV=/dev/loop1
>> export SCRATCH_MNT=/mnt1/scratch
>>
>> [s1]
>> export FSTYP=xfs
>> export TEST_DEV=/dev/loop0
>> export TEST_DIR=/mnt1/test
>> export SCRATCH_DEV=/dev/loop1
>> export SCRATCH_MNT=/mnt1/scratch
>>
>> ./check selftest/001
>>
>> Root cause:
>> When _test_mount() is executed for the second section, the FSTYPE has
>> already changed but the new fs specific common/$FSTYP has not yet
>> been done. Hence _xfs_prepare_for_eio_shutdown() is not found and
>> the test run fails.
>>
>> Fix:
>> Remove the additional _test_mount in check file just before ". commom/rc"
>> since ". commom/rc" is already sourcing fs specific imports and doing a
>> _test_mount.
>>
>> Fixes: 1a49022fab9b4 ("fstests: always use fail-at-unmount semantics for XFS")
>> Signed-off-by: Nirjhar Roy (IBM) <nirjhar.roy.lists@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> check | 12 +++---------
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/check b/check
>> index 607d2456..5cb4e7eb 100755
>> --- a/check
>> +++ b/check
>> @@ -784,15 +784,9 @@ function run_section()
>> status=1
>> exit
>> fi
>> - if ! _test_mount
> Don't we want to _test_mount the newly created filesystem still? But
> perhaps after sourcing common/rc ?
>
> --D
common/rc calls init_rc() in the end and init_rc() already does a
_test_mount. _test_mount after sourcing common/rc will fail, won't it?
Does that make sense?
init_rc()
{
# make some further configuration checks here
if [ "$TEST_DEV" = "" ]
then
echo "common/rc: Error: \$TEST_DEV is not set"
exit 1
fi
# if $TEST_DEV is not mounted, mount it now as XFS
if [ -z "`_fs_type $TEST_DEV`" ]
then
# $TEST_DEV is not mounted
if ! _test_mount
then
echo "common/rc: retrying test device mount with external set"
[ "$USE_EXTERNAL" != "yes" ] && export USE_EXTERNAL=yes
if ! _test_mount
then
echo "common/rc: could not mount $TEST_DEV on $TEST_DIR"
exit 1
fi
fi
fi
...
...
--NR
>
>> - then
>> - echo "check: failed to mount $TEST_DEV on $TEST_DIR"
>> - status=1
>> - exit
>> - fi
>> - # TEST_DEV has been recreated, previous FSTYP derived from
>> - # TEST_DEV could be changed, source common/rc again with
>> - # correct FSTYP to get FSTYP specific configs, e.g. common/xfs
>> + # Previous FSTYP derived from TEST_DEV could be changed, source
>> + # common/rc again with correct FSTYP to get FSTYP specific configs,
>> + # e.g. common/xfs
>> . common/rc
>> _prepare_test_list
>> elif [ "$OLD_TEST_FS_MOUNT_OPTS" != "$TEST_FS_MOUNT_OPTS" ]; then
>> --
>> 2.34.1
>>
>>
--
Nirjhar Roy
Linux Kernel Developer
IBM, Bangalore
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-29 11:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-28 5:00 [PATCH v2] check: Fix fs specfic imports when $FSTYPE!=$OLD_FSTYPE Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-01-28 18:09 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-29 11:18 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM) [this message]
2025-01-29 16:02 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-31 13:19 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-01-31 16:24 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-01 6:35 ` Zorro Lang
2025-02-06 18:02 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-02-10 14:23 ` Zorro Lang
2025-02-21 4:14 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-02-21 5:47 ` Zorro Lang
2025-02-21 5:49 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-02-06 5:35 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-02-06 15:52 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-06 17:58 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-02-01 7:05 ` Zorro Lang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f89b6b40-8dce-4378-ba56-cf7f29695bdb@gmail.com \
--to=nirjhar.roy.lists@gmail.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=zlang@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox