public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Nirjhar Roy (IBM)" <nirjhar.roy.lists@gmail.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, ritesh.list@gmail.com,
	ojaswin@linux.ibm.com, zlang@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] check: Fix fs specfic imports when $FSTYPE!=$OLD_FSTYPE
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2025 16:48:10 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f89b6b40-8dce-4378-ba56-cf7f29695bdb@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250128180917.GA3561257@frogsfrogsfrogs>


On 1/28/25 23:39, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 05:00:22AM +0000, Nirjhar Roy (IBM) wrote:
>> Bug Description:
>>
>> _test_mount function is failing with the following error:
>> ./common/rc: line 4716: _xfs_prepare_for_eio_shutdown: command not found
>> check: failed to mount /dev/loop0 on /mnt1/test
>>
>> when the second section in local.config file is xfs and the first section
>> is non-xfs.
>>
>> It can be easily reproduced with the following local.config file
>>
>> [s2]
>> export FSTYP=ext4
>> export TEST_DEV=/dev/loop0
>> export TEST_DIR=/mnt1/test
>> export SCRATCH_DEV=/dev/loop1
>> export SCRATCH_MNT=/mnt1/scratch
>>
>> [s1]
>> export FSTYP=xfs
>> export TEST_DEV=/dev/loop0
>> export TEST_DIR=/mnt1/test
>> export SCRATCH_DEV=/dev/loop1
>> export SCRATCH_MNT=/mnt1/scratch
>>
>> ./check selftest/001
>>
>> Root cause:
>> When _test_mount() is executed for the second section, the FSTYPE has
>> already changed but the new fs specific common/$FSTYP has not yet
>> been done. Hence _xfs_prepare_for_eio_shutdown() is not found and
>> the test run fails.
>>
>> Fix:
>> Remove the additional _test_mount in check file just before ". commom/rc"
>> since ". commom/rc" is already sourcing fs specific imports and doing a
>> _test_mount.
>>
>> Fixes: 1a49022fab9b4 ("fstests: always use fail-at-unmount semantics for XFS")
>> Signed-off-by: Nirjhar Roy (IBM) <nirjhar.roy.lists@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>   check | 12 +++---------
>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/check b/check
>> index 607d2456..5cb4e7eb 100755
>> --- a/check
>> +++ b/check
>> @@ -784,15 +784,9 @@ function run_section()
>>   			status=1
>>   			exit
>>   		fi
>> -		if ! _test_mount
> Don't we want to _test_mount the newly created filesystem still?  But
> perhaps after sourcing common/rc ?
>
> --D

common/rc calls init_rc() in the end and init_rc() already does a 
_test_mount. _test_mount after sourcing common/rc will fail, won't it? 
Does that make sense?

init_rc()
{
     # make some further configuration checks here
     if [ "$TEST_DEV" = ""  ]
     then
         echo "common/rc: Error: \$TEST_DEV is not set"
         exit 1
     fi

     # if $TEST_DEV is not mounted, mount it now as XFS
     if [ -z "`_fs_type $TEST_DEV`" ]
     then
         # $TEST_DEV is not mounted
         if ! _test_mount
         then
             echo "common/rc: retrying test device mount with external set"
             [ "$USE_EXTERNAL" != "yes" ] && export USE_EXTERNAL=yes
             if ! _test_mount
             then
                 echo "common/rc: could not mount $TEST_DEV on $TEST_DIR"
                 exit 1
             fi
         fi
     fi
...

...

--NR



>
>> -		then
>> -			echo "check: failed to mount $TEST_DEV on $TEST_DIR"
>> -			status=1
>> -			exit
>> -		fi
>> -		# TEST_DEV has been recreated, previous FSTYP derived from
>> -		# TEST_DEV could be changed, source common/rc again with
>> -		# correct FSTYP to get FSTYP specific configs, e.g. common/xfs
>> +		# Previous FSTYP derived from TEST_DEV could be changed, source
>> +		# common/rc again with correct FSTYP to get FSTYP specific configs,
>> +		# e.g. common/xfs
>>   		. common/rc
>>   		_prepare_test_list
>>   	elif [ "$OLD_TEST_FS_MOUNT_OPTS" != "$TEST_FS_MOUNT_OPTS" ]; then
>> -- 
>> 2.34.1
>>
>>
-- 
Nirjhar Roy
Linux Kernel Developer
IBM, Bangalore


  reply	other threads:[~2025-01-29 11:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-28  5:00 [PATCH v2] check: Fix fs specfic imports when $FSTYPE!=$OLD_FSTYPE Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-01-28 18:09 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-29 11:18   ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM) [this message]
2025-01-29 16:02     ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-31 13:19       ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-01-31 16:24         ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-01  6:35           ` Zorro Lang
2025-02-06 18:02             ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-02-10 14:23               ` Zorro Lang
2025-02-21  4:14                 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-02-21  5:47                   ` Zorro Lang
2025-02-21  5:49                     ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-02-06  5:35           ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-02-06 15:52             ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-06 17:58               ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-02-01  7:05 ` Zorro Lang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f89b6b40-8dce-4378-ba56-cf7f29695bdb@gmail.com \
    --to=nirjhar.roy.lists@gmail.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=zlang@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox