From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n4RHMIKZ200186 for ; Wed, 27 May 2009 12:22:21 -0500 Received: from foehn.mgras.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 1EF9A101A193 for ; Wed, 27 May 2009 10:28:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from foehn.mgras.de (quickstep.mgras.net [213.146.115.59]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id q3tMk33vdB1NHqXX for ; Wed, 27 May 2009 10:28:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from osprey.mgras.de (osprey.mgras.de [192.168.48.3]) by foehn.mgras.de (8.13.1/8.13.0) with ESMTP id n4RHLeve002796 for ; Wed, 27 May 2009 19:21:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from news@localhost) by osprey.mgras.de (AIX5.1/8.11.6p2/8.11.0) id n4RHLeF35674 for linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com; Wed, 27 May 2009 19:21:40 +0200 From: Martin Spott Subject: Re: Kernel crash with 2.6.29 + nfs + xfs (radix-tree) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 17:21:40 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <20090520003745.GA27491@samad.com.au> <20090526090916.GA17194@infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com Christoph Hellwig wrote: > May 24 08:48:00 (none) last message repeated 61 times > May 24 08:48:47 (none) last message repeated 760 times > May 24 08:50:55 (none) kernel: reconnect_path: npd != pd > May 24 08:50:55 (none) last message repeated 9 times > May 24 08:55:04 (none) kernel: reconnect_path: npd != pd > May 24 08:56:05 (none) last message repeated 47 times > May 24 08:56:49 (none) last message repeated 419 times Resembles me of trouble I've recently seen on some of the machines I maintain after updating from 2.6.27.11 to 2.6.29.[2,3], serving a few dozend LTSP (diskless so-called thin-clients) root filesystems via NFS from XFS - not really huge load, to be honest. After running 2.6.29.4 for one day now I have the feeling that the issue had been cured - but I didn't manage to get a clue about the fix. Very few people have been reporting a similar issue here: http://www.mail-archive.com/debian-user@lists.debian.org/msg545497.html and here: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=527517 Additional information wanted ? Cheers, Martin. -- Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are ! -------------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs