From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o7BI8Krf153709 for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 13:08:21 -0500 Received: from lo.gmane.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 9EDACC8167B for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 11:17:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id Smsvlse4bC1C5CW0 for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 11:17:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OjFjF-00062n-Ff for linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 20:08:41 +0200 Received: from barriere.frankfurter-softwarefabrik.de ([217.11.197.1]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 20:08:41 +0200 Received: from niemayer by barriere.frankfurter-softwarefabrik.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 20:08:41 +0200 From: Peter Niemayer Subject: Re: observed significant performance improvement using "delaylog" in a real-world application Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 20:08:33 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20100811000854.GL26402@dastard> Mime-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20100811000854.GL26402@dastard> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com On 08/11/2010 02:08 AM, Dave Chinner wrote: > One thing that you might want to try to > further improve performance is the logbsize=262144 option as well. > That will help flush log IO faster by doing less IOs. Tried that - but this did not have a positive effect. (In fact a slightly negative one, but that could be within the measurement accuracy). > Also, if your workload is doing lots of fsync calls, then the > optimisations I posted a few days ago should also help improve > delaylog throughput. We don't to any fsync's. Regards, Peter Niemayer _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs