From: Brian Duncan <brianmduncan@gmail.com>
To: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: xfssyncd and disk spin down
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 18:04:23 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <loom.20110214T185310-606@post.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20110210221851.GG2559@dastard
Dave Chinner <david <at> fromorbit.com> writes:
>
> On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 10:42:54PM +0200, Petre Rodan wrote:
> >
> > Hello Dave,
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 10:43:10AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > .....
> > > > in other words xfsyncd and xfsbufd now alternate at 18s intervals
> > > > keeping the drive busy with nothing constructive hours after the
> > > > last write to the drive.
> > >
> > > This is a different problem, and not one I've seen before. Looking
> > > at the traces, it appears that we have not empties the AIL. At
> > > least, that's what I'm assuming at this point because log IO
> > > completion is not updating log tail. When we start a log IO, we set
> > > the log header lsn to the current head:
> > >
> > > > xfssyncd/sdc1-1413 [000] 3356.093456: xfs_log_reserve: dev 8:33
type DUMMY1 t_ocnt 1 t_cnt 1
> t_curr_res 2740 t_unit_res 2740 t_flags XLOG_TIC_INITED reserveq empty writeq
empty
> grant_reserve_cycle 2 grant_reserve_bytes 428523008 grant_write_cycle 2
grant_write_bytes
> 428523008 curr_cycle 2 curr_block 836959 tail_cycle 2 tail_block 810683
> > >
> > > Which in this case is: curr_cycle 2 curr_block 836959
> > >
> > > When the log IO completes, that value gets written to the
> > > l_last_sync_lsn. When the AIL tail is removed, the tail lsn is
> > > updated to the new tail item. If the AIL is empty, then the
> > > l_last_sync_lsn is used. That means then next dummy transaction
> > > made to cover the log should have the cycle/block of the above
> > > current cycle.
> > >
> > > Instead, what I see is that the next dummmy transaction shows:
> > >
> > > > xfssyncd/sdc1-1413 [000] 3392.067122: xfs_log_reserve: dev 8:33
type DUMMY1 t_ocnt 1 t_cnt 1
> t_curr_res 2740 t_unit_res 2740 t_flags XLOG_TIC_INITED reserveq empty writeq
empty
> grant_reserve_cycle 2 grant_reserve_bytes 428524032 grant_write_cycle 2
grant_write_bytes
> 428524032 curr_cycle 2 curr_block 836961 tail_cycle 2 tail_block 810683
> > >
> > > The current head has moved: curr_cycle 2 curr_block 836961
> > >
> > > But the tail hasn't: tail_cycle 2 tail_block 810683
> > >
> > > So effectively we've got some item on the AIL that we haven't
> > > flushed and isn't being flushed by xfssyncd. That's the problem I
> > > need to get to the bottom of and it also explains why it's an
> > > intermitten problem...
> >
> > I have been watching the stream of patches that go into 2.6.38,
> > but I probably missed the one that might be the answer to the
> > problem above. can you please tell me which one to try, or can I
> > help with anything?
>
> I know what the problem is, but I haven't had time to work out of
> code a fix. Been spending my time trying to work out the cause bugs
> that are triggering hangs, crashes or corruptions here...
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dave.
FYI,
I found this thread after searching.. I upgraded one of my servers and
encountered this issue with XFS keeping drives from going to sleep with its
constant writing (after a copy to a volume).
I just wanted to note that I have an XFS volume that does have lazy-count set to
1 that this is occuring with, with 2.6.327.
meta-data=/dev/sdf1 isize=256 agcount=4, agsize=122094500 blks
= sectsz=512 attr=2
data = bsize=4096 blocks=488378000, imaxpct=5
= sunit=0 swidth=0 blks
naming =version 2 bsize=4096 ascii-ci=0
log =internal bsize=4096 blocks=238465, version=2
= sectsz=512 sunit=0 blks, lazy-count=1
realtime =none extsz=4096 blocks=0, rtextents=0
After writing any data to this drive, this would occur indefinitely:(until I
unmount and remount the drive)
[ 2839.120064] xfssyncd/sdf1(756): WRITE block 1954432155 on sdf1 (2 sectors)
[ 2869.120065] xfssyncd/sdf1(756): WRITE block 1954432157 on sdf1 (2 sectors)
[ 2899.120066] xfssyncd/sdf1(756): WRITE block 1954432159 on sdf1 (2 sectors)
[ 2929.120065] xfssyncd/sdf1(756): WRITE block 1954432161 on sdf1 (2 sectors)
[ 2959.120060] xfssyncd/sdf1(756): WRITE block 1954432163 on sdf1 (2 sectors)
[ 2989.120061] xfssyncd/sdf1(756): WRITE block 1954432165 on sdf1 (2 sectors)
[ 3019.120058] xfssyncd/sdf1(756): WRITE block 1954432167 on sdf1 (2 sectors)
[ 3049.120056] xfssyncd/sdf1(756): WRITE block 1954432169 on sdf1 (2 sectors)
[ 3079.120058] xfssyncd/sdf1(756): WRITE block 1954432171 on sdf1 (2 sectors)
[ 3109.120059] xfssyncd/sdf1(756): WRITE block 1954432173 on sdf1 (2 sectors)
[ 3139.120065] xfssyncd/sdf1(756): WRITE block 1954432175 on sdf1 (2 sectors)
[ 3169.120061] xfssyncd/sdf1(756): WRITE block 1954432177 on sdf1 (2 sectors)
[ 3199.120062] xfssyncd/sdf1(756): WRITE block 1954432179 on sdf1 (2 sectors)
[ 3229.120060] xfssyncd/sdf1(756): WRITE block 1954432181 on sdf1 (2 sectors)
[ 3259.120067] xfssyncd/sdf1(756): WRITE block 1954432183 on sdf1 (2 sectors)
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-14 18:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-23 16:55 xfssyncd and disk spin down Petre Rodan
2010-12-23 19:29 ` Stan Hoeppner
2010-12-23 21:16 ` Petre Rodan
2010-12-24 0:54 ` Stan Hoeppner
2010-12-24 5:15 ` Stan Hoeppner
2010-12-24 6:02 ` Petre Rodan
2010-12-24 23:00 ` Stan Hoeppner
2010-12-25 3:36 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-12-25 4:32 ` Stan Hoeppner
2010-12-24 18:17 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-12-25 12:09 ` Petre Rodan
2010-12-27 2:19 ` Dave Chinner
2010-12-27 6:16 ` Petre Rodan
2010-12-27 14:07 ` Dave Chinner
2010-12-27 17:19 ` Petre Rodan
2010-12-31 0:13 ` Dave Chinner
2011-01-20 10:01 ` Petre Rodan
2011-01-20 11:06 ` Dave Chinner
2011-01-20 12:07 ` Petre Rodan
2011-01-20 13:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-01-20 23:43 ` Dave Chinner
2011-02-10 20:42 ` Petre Rodan
2011-02-10 22:18 ` Dave Chinner
2011-02-14 18:04 ` Brian Duncan [this message]
2011-05-31 14:40 ` Brian Duncan
2011-05-31 15:16 ` Michael Weissenbacher
2011-06-01 23:37 ` Dave Chinner
2011-07-11 4:02 ` Brian Duncan
2011-07-11 14:34 ` Michael Weissenbacher
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=loom.20110214T185310-606@post.gmane.org \
--to=brianmduncan@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox