From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Tue, 03 Jun 2008 17:56:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [192.26.58.22]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id m540uLSY006936 for ; Tue, 3 Jun 2008 17:56:21 -0700 From: Niv Sardi Subject: Re: DMAPI JFS bug fixes References: <483C78E2.4090000@sonic.net> <483C8227.6090408@sgi.com> <4FC34C16-F0FA-49C5-88CC-83EEF616C218@sonic.net> Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2008 10:57:13 +1000 In-Reply-To: <4FC34C16-F0FA-49C5-88CC-83EEF616C218@sonic.net> (Gary Lowell's message of "Thu, 29 May 2008 19:16:01 -0700") Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Gary Lowell Cc: markgw@sgi.com, xfs@oss.sgi.com Gary Lowell writes: > On May 27, 2008, at 2:50 PM, Mark Goodwin wrote: >> Gary Lowell wrote: >>> Hi - >>> The JFS version of DMAPI had a handful of bug fixes that don't seem >>> to be in the current tree. I couldn't find anything in the list >>> archive about them. Would there be any interest in applying those >>> fixes or is DMAPI pretty much dead ? >> >> no it's not dead :) >> >>> If there is interest, I've got a patch. >> >> yes please post it here, with due reference to the original author(s). >> >> Thanks > > Great. I'll double check that they still work with TOT and post them. And i thought JFS was dead =) any patch would do, I've been looking around and couldn't really find a repository of the JFS/DMAPI changes. did you find anything like that ? Cheers, -- Niv Sardi