From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com>
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Thu, 21 Feb 2008 18:52:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.168.29])
	by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id m1M2qD1f024484
	for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Thu, 21 Feb 2008 18:52:16 -0800
Received: from mail.sceen.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 4D9DC6047D3
	for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Thu, 21 Feb 2008 18:52:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.sceen.net (sceen.net [213.41.243.68]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 6aHecx2C6E4mMF4p for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Thu, 21 Feb 2008 18:52:39 -0800 (PST)
From: Niv Sardi <xaiki@sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC, patch 2/2] xfsqa test to check log size scaling
In-Reply-To: <20080221230943.GH155407@sgi.com> (David Chinner's message of
	"Fri, 22 Feb 2008 10:09:43 +1100")
References: <20080221230943.GH155407@sgi.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 13:51:14 +1100
Message-ID: <nccoda91z6l.fsf@sgi.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com
Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com
List-Id: xfs
To: David Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>
Cc: xfs-dev <xfs-dev@sgi.com>, xfs-oss <xfs@oss.sgi.com>

David Chinner <dgc@sgi.com> writes:

> XFS-QA test to check that log size scaling works correctly
> for old and new maximum log sizes.

Looks good to me.

Cheers,
-- 
Niv Sardi