From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com>
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Mon, 05 Feb 2007 01:33:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx1.suse.de (ns.suse.de [195.135.220.2])
	by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id l159Wx3c030924
	for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Mon, 5 Feb 2007 01:33:00 -0800
Subject: Re: Spam on list?
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0702040822520.14035@p34.internal.lan>
	<45C62982.1090206@sandeen.net>
From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Date: 05 Feb 2007 11:32:25 +0100
In-Reply-To: <45C62982.1090206@sandeen.net>
Message-ID: <p73wt2wnbd2.fsf@bingen.suse.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com
Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com
List-Id: xfs
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
Cc: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>, xfs@oss.sgi.com

Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net> writes:
> 
> I think it may be time to revisit that decision.  It's gotten really
> bad lately.

Please don't do that. It means nothing can be cross posted
from l-k anymore, which would be pretty bad.

-Andi