* xfsaild 20 wakeups per second
@ 2016-06-09 16:43 Jason L Tibbitts III
2016-06-09 17:18 ` Brian Foster
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jason L Tibbitts III @ 2016-06-09 16:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xfs
I was tuning the power consumption of my new laptop and noticed that
each xfsaild process is still waking up 20 times per second. I found
http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2012-03/msg00237.html which I think
indicates that this was a workaround for some other issue and wouldn't
be permanent. Unfortunately that was 4+ years ago. I wasn't able to
locate any other discussion about the topic.
Was it determined that the wakeups were going to have to stay
permanently? Or was the issue just not revisited? And if the former,
is there a way to tune the wakeup frequency in any way?
- J<
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: xfsaild 20 wakeups per second
2016-06-09 16:43 xfsaild 20 wakeups per second Jason L Tibbitts III
@ 2016-06-09 17:18 ` Brian Foster
2016-06-09 18:08 ` Jason L Tibbitts III
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Brian Foster @ 2016-06-09 17:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jason L Tibbitts III; +Cc: xfs
On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 11:43:11AM -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> I was tuning the power consumption of my new laptop and noticed that
> each xfsaild process is still waking up 20 times per second. I found
> http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2012-03/msg00237.html which I think
> indicates that this was a workaround for some other issue and wouldn't
> be permanent. Unfortunately that was 4+ years ago. I wasn't able to
> locate any other discussion about the topic.
>
> Was it determined that the wakeups were going to have to stay
> permanently? Or was the issue just not revisited? And if the former,
> is there a way to tune the wakeup frequency in any way?
>
The short answer is that the wakeups are probably going to be around for
the immediate future. There was some recent discussion on this here (see
the follow up thread to the patch):
http://oss.sgi.com/pipermail/xfs/2016-April/048526.html
Brian
> - J<
>
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@oss.sgi.com
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: xfsaild 20 wakeups per second
2016-06-09 17:18 ` Brian Foster
@ 2016-06-09 18:08 ` Jason L Tibbitts III
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jason L Tibbitts III @ 2016-06-09 18:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Brian Foster; +Cc: xfs
>>>>> "BF" == Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com> writes:
BF> There was some recent discussion on this here (see the follow up
BF> thread to the patch):
Ah. Sorry about bringing that back up; I just joined and I wasn't using
the right search terms to find the previous thread in the archives.
At least I now know what's happening.
- J<
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-06-09 18:08 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-06-09 16:43 xfsaild 20 wakeups per second Jason L Tibbitts III
2016-06-09 17:18 ` Brian Foster
2016-06-09 18:08 ` Jason L Tibbitts III
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox