From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "James Brown" To: Cc: Subject: RE: planb in BK tree.. Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 14:49:50 +0800 Message-ID: <000001c085d1$da042e20$a100a8c0@james> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" In-Reply-To: <200101231925.UAA00899@piglet.grunz.lu> Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: >Hi there, > >Sorry for replying late, but I'm still wading through a 400-message >backlog... Yes, I know the feeling well :) >> Any chance of getting the planb driver in the current 2_4 bitkeeper tree >> patched with the 2.4 fix for it? :) >I'll get back to work on PlanB somewhere in late February, hopefully. >Feel free to post a working diff, if you have one. Where did you get the >original patches from? Basically I manually applied the http://www.cpu.lu/~mlan/ftp/planb-2.4.0-t6-patch patch against the current BK tree at the time. That seemed to fix the issues I was having with 2.4.0 crashing on boot (couldn't find the PlanB device, but was giving me the previous, cryptic, error message). I can probably whip up a diff later, but that'd involve me finding some spare time of my own *grin*. > I spent most of last night manually patching the thing (for some reason a > few chunks failed, and I had nothing else to do) - After applying that my > whole setup works great, except for a few things I think are caused by > package version messups. What version messups would that be? Turned out to be a few endian issues with other drivers (consolefb doesn't like having VGA Console turned on). >Michel >------------------------------------------------------------------------- >Michel Lanners | " Read Philosophy. Study Art. >23, Rue Paul Henkes | Ask Questions. Make Mistakes. >L-1710 Luxembourg | >email mlan@cpu.lu | >http://www.cpu.lu/~mlan | Learn Always. " ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/