From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kevin Hendricks Reply-To: khendricks@ivey.uwo.ca To: anthony tong , Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: [linux-fbdev] Re: Fwd: Re: still no accelerated X ($#!$*) Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2000 21:44:52 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: khendricks@ivey.uwo.ca, linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org, linux-fbdev@vuser.vu.union.edu References: <00012021232600.07340@localhost.localdomain> <20000121151511.029555@mailhost.mipsys.com> <20000122145451.A26894@rogue.genunix.net> In-Reply-To: <20000122145451.A26894@rogue.genunix.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <00012221475102.00489@localhost.localdomain> Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: Hi Anthony, > > I'll put back eieio() in the access macros for my kernels until a > > definitive answer pops up on this issue. > > I must have missed when these were taken out; does anyone know the reason > why it was done? When the eieio's in aty128fb.c have been added back in to the version that was backported to 2.2.14 please cc a copy of the file you send to Ben to me also. I am still having trouble debugging some final nits in the xf 3.9.17 r128 module and would love to have a "fixed" driver. Thanks, Kevin ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/