linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* my web page
@ 2000-02-15  6:12 Paul Mackerras
  2000-02-15 11:13 ` Alain RICHARD
  2000-02-15 11:13 ` my " Ramprasad Rao
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Paul Mackerras @ 2000-02-15  6:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linuxppc-dev


I have done a little web page describing the current state of kernel
development for the powermac and how to get my rsync trees.  It's at
http://linuxcare.com.au/paulus/kernels.html.  Let me know if there is
anything I should explain better (or more).  :-)

--
Paul Mackerras, Senior Open Source Researcher, Linuxcare, Inc.
+61 2 6262 8990 tel, +61 2 6262 8991 fax
paulus@linuxcare.com.au, http://www.linuxcare.com.au/
Linuxcare.  Support for the revolution.

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re:my web page
  2000-02-15  6:12 my web page Paul Mackerras
@ 2000-02-15 11:13 ` Alain RICHARD
  2000-02-15 11:13 ` my " Ramprasad Rao
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Alain RICHARD @ 2000-02-15 11:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linuxppc-dev


>I have done a little web page describing the current state of kernel
>development for the powermac and how to get my rsync trees.  It's at
>http://linuxcare.com.au/paulus/kernels.html.  Let me know if there is
>anything I should explain better (or more).  :-)
>
>--
>Paul Mackerras, Senior Open Source Researcher, Linuxcare, Inc.
>+61 2 6262 8990 tel, +61 2 6262 8991 fax
>paulus@linuxcare.com.au, http://www.linuxcare.com.au/
>Linuxcare.  Support for the revolution.

This is a very helpfull page. It was needed since a lot of time.

Just somes remarks :

I think we need an "official" stable pmac/ppc version. It is not
always clear if the main kernel release version is good for us (and
in many cases it proved to be good for old hardware), or what is the
current mostly recommended official version for ppc architecture (for
example the last one really distributed .

This version may be distributed as just a diff file from the official
ftp.kernel.org stable version and a comment to what hardware is or is
not supported. I am bored to see a lot of binary stable kernels
distributed without corresponding sources, so please always let us
recompile our own kernel with our own set of options.

My second remark is that it is very difficult for us to know to whom
patches must be submited. In the past I have used several options :

- submit a patch to the author or maintener of the source I patch.
Not always possible because somes patches will impact several sources
maintained by several different people. This was shown as the most
efficient option when avail.
- submit patch to the main kernel list or main kernel mainteners. Not
always efficient because some patches that are not specific to the
pmac architecture are difficult to explain to the i386 centric main
kernel (for example edianess problems or hardware architecture
peculiarities).
- submit patch to the pmac or ppc kernel maintener (paulus and cort).

It is a problem for me to see theses tree kernels separated (pmac,ppc
and kernel.org) and sometime there are problems in synchronizing
them. For example I have seen some patches included in one of theses
kernels and lost in synchronisation. Or I have got some patch that
where never included and the kernel list plagged with complains about
exactly the same problem I was have submit a patch month ago.

So please, setup a page (for example on linuxppc.org or
www.ppc.kernel.org) to indicates to us, potential kernel supporters,
the simplest way of supporting ppc kernels.

Regards,

-------------------------------------------------------
Alain RICHARD <mailto:alain.richard@equation.fr>
EQUATION SA <http://www.equation.fr/>
Tel : +33 477 79 48 00	 Fax : +33 477 79 48 01
Applications client/serveur, ingénierie réseau et Linux

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: my web page
  2000-02-15  6:12 my web page Paul Mackerras
  2000-02-15 11:13 ` Alain RICHARD
@ 2000-02-15 11:13 ` Ramprasad Rao
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ramprasad Rao @ 2000-02-15 11:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Paul Mackerras; +Cc: linuxppc-dev



Paul (also Jeff Garzik) -

Jeff had a patch that allowed 2.3.42 to boot. Would that provide the fix
for 2.3.45?

Ramprasad
On Tue, 15 Feb 2000, Paul Mackerras wrote:

>
> I have done a little web page describing the current state of kernel
> development for the powermac and how to get my rsync trees.  It's at
> http://linuxcare.com.au/paulus/kernels.html.  Let me know if there is
> anything I should explain better (or more).  :-)
>
> --
> Paul Mackerras, Senior Open Source Researcher, Linuxcare, Inc.
> +61 2 6262 8990 tel, +61 2 6262 8991 fax
> paulus@linuxcare.com.au, http://www.linuxcare.com.au/
> Linuxcare.  Support for the revolution.
>


** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2000-02-15 11:13 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2000-02-15  6:12 my web page Paul Mackerras
2000-02-15 11:13 ` Alain RICHARD
2000-02-15 11:13 ` my " Ramprasad Rao

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).